HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

Date	24/09/1992
AppNr	10533/83
Body	Court (Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 13; 3; 41; 5-1; 5-3; 5-4; 8
Violated / NonViolated	5-481035-15-38
Citations	35-15-1-c5-1-e5-35-45-566-16-3-c81325-1P1-12355-15-1-e5-45-56-181013141834P1-1

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 5-1
No violation of Art. 5-3
No violation of Art. 8
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Not necessary to examine Art. 13
Violation of Art. 10
Violation of Art. 5-4
Violation of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom to receive information
(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 3) degrading punishment
(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 3) inhuman punishment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
(art. 5-1-e) persons of unsound mind
(art. 5-3) length of pre-trial detention
(art. 5-3) release pending trial
(art. 5-4) take proceedings
(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	A244
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	10533/83
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Austria
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	19/04/1991
Date of Judgment	24/09/1992
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; No violation of Art. 5-3 ; No violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles	3 ; 5-1 ; 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 8 ; 10 ; 13 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Criminal Code, Articles 21, 25 and 83 ; Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 429 para. 4 and 438
Strasbourg Case Law	X v. United Kingdom judgment of 5 November 1981, Series A no. 46, pp. 17-18, para. 39, p. 23, para. 52 ; B. v. Austria judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-15, paras. 36, 38 ; Van der Leer v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 170-A, p. 12, para. 22 ; Wassink v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 185-A, p. 11, paras. 24, 25 ; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, p. 18, paras. 39-40 ; Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, p. 35, para. 84 ; Koendjbiharie v. the Netherlands judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 185-B, p. 40, para. 27 ; Kruslin v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, paras. 26-27, pp. 22-23, para. 30 ; Huvig v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, paras. 25-26, pp. 54-55, para. 29 ; Silver and others v. United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 33, para. 88 ; Malone v. United Kingdom judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82, pp. 32-33, paras. 67-68
External Sources	Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 180, 184, 187, 188, 194, 195, 429, 438 ; Criminal Code, Articles 21, 25 ; Civil Code, Articles 216, 282 ; Hospitals Law, Sections 8, 51 par. 1 ; Incapacitation Regulations of 1916, Sections 1 para. 2, 3 and 4
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO RECEIVE INFORMATION" "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING PUNISHMENT" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN PUNISHMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1-e) PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND" "(Art. 5-3) LENGTH OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-3) RELEASE PENDING TRIAL" "(Art. 5-4) TAKE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"

Application Documents 2

	I.H. v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision (Final)	04/10/1989
	HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision (Partial)	10/03/1988

References 10

	63 WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGES. M.B.H. (no. 2) v. AUSTRIA Court (Third Section) Decision	14/11/2002
	235 TOMASI v. FRANCE 5-3, 3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/08/1992
	19 KOENDJBIHARIE v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/10/1990
	153 WASSINK v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-1, 5-4, 5-5 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1990
	99 B. v. AUSTRIA 5-3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/03/1990
	61 VAN DER LEER v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-1, 5-2, 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1990
	98 MALONE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	02/08/1984
	228 SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1983
	80 X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-4, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	05/11/1981
	251 WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-4, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/10/1979

Show all (10)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 68

Citations 68

	A. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 5-1, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/11/2011
	GOROBET v. MOLDOVA 5-1, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2011
	KARAMANOF v. GREECE 5-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/07/2011
	FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE 3, 8, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/2011
	TUPA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/2011
	DOSSI ET AUTRES c. ITALIE Court (Second Section) Decision	12/10/2010
	4 SABEVA v. BULGARIA 3, 5-1, 5-4, 5-5 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/06/2010
	2 UMIT ISIK v. TURKEY 5-3, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/03/2010
	7 CODARCEA v. ROMANIA 6, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/06/2009
	11 SLAWOMIR MUSIAL v. POLAND 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/01/2009

ECHR CaseLaw

HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

References 10

Citations Breakdown

Citations 68

Similar documents