MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH AND KLAUS BEERMANN v. GERMANY View

Notes

Date	20/11/1989
AppNr	10572/83
Body	Court (Plenary)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	10
Violated / NonViolated	10
Citations	5-36-16-3-b8109101314

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 10

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others

References 5

	63 BARFOD v. DENMARK 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/02/1989
	46 MÜLLER AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/05/1988
	67 BARTHOLD v. GERMANY 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1985
	124 THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1) 10, 10, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	26/04/1979
	234 KLASS AND OTHERS v. GERMANY 8, 13, 6 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	06/09/1978

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 51

Citations 51

	SOSINOWSKA v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/10/2011
	1 RTBF v. BELGIUM 6-1, 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/03/2011
	BOJOLYAN v. ARMENIA Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	03/11/2009
	2 BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 9 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	27/10/2009
	1 HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES (ICI PARIS) v. FRANCE 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/07/2009
	SOCIETE DE CONCEPTION DE PRESSE ET D'EDITION AND PONSON v. FRANCE 10, 14 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	05/03/2009
	35 HACHETTE FILIPACCHI PRESSE AUTOMOBILE AND DUPUY v. FRANCE 10, 14 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	05/03/2009
	1 TV VEST AS & ROGALAND PENSJONISTPARTI v. NORWAY 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/12/2008
	8 VAJNAI v. HUNGARY 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/2008
	8 TIMPUL INFO-MAGAZIN AND ANGHEL v. MOLDOVA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/2007

Originating Body	Court (Plenary)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	A165
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	10572/83
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Germany
Referred by	Commission ; Federal Republic of Germany
Date of Reference	14/03/1988
	18/04/1988
Date of Judgment	20/11/1989
Applicability	Art. 10 applicable
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 10
Articles	10
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Unfair Competition Act of 7 June 1909, Section 1
Strasbourg Case Law	Sunday Times judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, para. 49 ; Barthold judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, p. 22, para. 47, p. 25, para. 55 ; Müller and Others judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 19, para. 27, p. 20, para. 29 ; Barfod judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, para. 28
External Sources	Basic Law, Article 5 ; Unfair Competition Act of 7 June 1909, Sections 1, 14 ; Civil Code, Article 824 ; Federal Court of Justice, civil cases ("BGHZ") 14, pp. 163, 170-172 - Constanze II ; Federal Court of Justice, civil cases ("BGHZ") 31, pp. 308, 318-319 - Alte Herren ; Federal Court of Justice, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht ("BGH GRUR") 1962, pp. 45, 48 - Betonzusatzmittel ; Federal Court of Justice, Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, ("NJW") 1966, pp. 647, 649 - Reichstagsbrand
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS"

ECHR CaseLaw

MARKT INTERN VERLAG GMBH AND KLAUS BEERMANN v. GERMANY View

Notes

ECHR Notes

References 5

Citations Breakdown

Citations 51

Similar documents