KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

Date	21/09/1993
AppNr	12350/86
Body	Court (Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 14+6; 41; 6-1; 6-2; 6-3-b; 6-3-c
Violated / NonViolated	6-16-3-c6-16-26-3-b6-3-c
Citations	235-35-466-16-36-3-a6-3-b6-3-c813235-166-16-3-b6-3-c8131434P1-1P7-4

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 6-1
No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-b
No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c
No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (pleas of nullity)
No violation of Art. 6-2
Not necessary to examine Art. 13
Not necessary to examine Art. 14+5-1-a
Not necessary to examine Art. 14+6
Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c
Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (appeals)

Keywords:

(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 6-1) equality of arms
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-2) presumption of innocence
(art. 6-3) rights of defence
(art. 6-3-b) access to relevant files
(art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
(art. 6-3-c) defence in person
jurisdiction of the court

Application Documents 1

KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

COMMISSION Decision

05/09/1990

References 3

	51 FEJDE v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	29/10/1991
	134 HELMERS v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/10/1991
	189 KAMASINSKI v. AUSTRIA 6-1, 6-1, 14, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/12/1989

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 63

Citations 63

	MIROSLAW ZIELINSKI v. POLAND 3, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/09/2011
	2 PIRALI ORUJOV v. AZERBAIJAN 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/02/2011
	KONONOV v. RUSSIA 6-1, 6-3-c, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/01/2011
	GOLDMANN AND SZENASZKY v. HUNGARY 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/11/2010
	7 SAKHNOVSKIY v. RUSSIA 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/11/2010
	1 SEVASTYANOV v. RUSSIA 6-1, 34 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/04/2010
	SUURIPAA v. FINLAND 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/01/2010
	1 JERONOVICS v. LATVIA 6-1, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/12/2009
	STEPANYAN v. ARMENIA Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/10/2009
	4 MAKSIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/10/2009

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	A268-B
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH;SLOVENIAN
Application Number	12350/86
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Austria
Referred by	Commission ; Austria
Date of Reference	11/09/1992
	01/10/1992
Date of Judgment	21/09/1993
Conclusion	Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-b ; No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (pleas of nullity) ; Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c (appeals) ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; No violation of Art. 6-2 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+6 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+5-1-a ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	6-1 , 6-2 , 6-3-b , 6-3-c , 13 , 14+6 , 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 285-c, 286, 296-3
Strasbourg Case Law	Brandstetter v. Austria judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, pp. 27-28, paras. 64-69 ; Kamasinski v. Austria judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168, p. 39, para. 88, p. 44, para. 106 ; Fejde v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-C, p. 68, para. 31 ; Helmers v. Sweden judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 15, paras. 31-32
External Sources	Code of Criminal Procedure, Sections 281 par. 1, 285-c, 286, 296-3, 344, 345 ; Federal Supreme Court Act, Sections 5, 6-1+2, 20 ; Supreme Court's Rules of Procedure, Sections 60, 65-2+4+8
Keywords	"(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-2) PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-b) ACCESS TO RELEVANT FILES" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE FACILITIES" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE TIME" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE IN PERSON" "JURISDICTION OF THE COURT"

ECHR CaseLaw

KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 3

Citations Breakdown

Citations 63

Similar documents