VLADIMIR POLISHCHUK AND SVETLANA POLISHCHUK v. UKRAINE  View

Notes

Date30/09/2010
AppNr12451/04
BodyCourt (Fifth Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles13; 13+8; 34; 35; 35-1; 8; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated813
Conclusions:
  • Remainder inadmissible
  • Violation of Art. 13+8
  • Violation of Art. 8
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 8-2) prescribed by law



References 11

1
OBCIANSKE ZDRUZENIE ZI A NECHAJ ZIT v. SLOVAKIA
Court (Fourth Section) Decision
09/02/2010
2
WATKINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Court (Fourth Section) Decision
06/10/2009
6
BIRIUK v. LITHUANIA 
8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/11/2008
13
ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA 
8, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
22/05/2008
4
VOLOKHY v. UKRAINE 
8, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
02/11/2006
3
PANTELEYENKO v. UKRAINE 
8, 6-2, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
29/06/2006
14
SILIADIN v. FRANCE 
4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/07/2005
44
BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY
Court (Second Section) Decision
28/05/2002
59
HAZAR, TEKTAS, BEKIROGLU, PEKOL, BOZKUS, TEKTAS, ATMAN, ISIK, AKSUCU, DOSTER, DEMIRHAN and SAHIN v. TURKEY
Court (First Section) Decision
10/01/2002
161
Z. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
3, 13, 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/05/2001
458
DALBAN v. ROMANIA 
10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/09/1999
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List