MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM / ECHR

Notes

Date	12/10/2006
AppNr	13178/03
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 3; 34; 41; 5-1-f; 5-4; 8
Violated / NonViolated	35-15-485-15-4
Citations	35-15-1-f5-46-1891435-15-4814

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 5-1
No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-4
No violation of Art. 5-4 (first applicant)
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Not necessary to examine Art. 13
Violation of Art. 5-1
Violation of Art. 5-4
Violations of Art. 3
Violations of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 34) victim
(art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
(art. 5-1) procedure prescribed by law
(art. 5-1-f) prevent unauthorised entry into country
(art. 5-4) review of lawfulness of detention
(art. 5-4) take proceedings
(art. 8-1) respect for family life
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) economic well-being of the country
(art. 8-2) national security
(art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 8-2) prevention of crime
(art. 8-2) prevention of disorder
positive obligations

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2006-XI
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	13178/03
Importance Level	1
Represented by	VANHEULE D.
Respondent State	Belgium
Date of Judgment	12/10/2006
Conclusion	Violations of Art. 3 ; Violations of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 5-1 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant) ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 5-4 (first applicant) ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles	3 , 5-1-f , 5-4 , 8 , 13 , 34 , 41
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	A. v. the United Kingdom du 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2699, § 22 ; Adam v. Germany (dec.), no. 43359/98, 4 October 2001 ; Aerts v. Belgium, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1961-1962, § 46 ; Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002, § 33 ; Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, § 42 and § 53 ; Beldjoudi v. France du 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-A, p. 27, § 74 ; Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 33202/96, § 27, 28 May 2002 ; Botta v. Italy, judgment of 24 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 422, § 32 ; Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX ; Bozano v. France, judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, p. 23, § 54 ; Cakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 98 ; Chahal v. Royaume Uni [GC], judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 126 ; Conka v. Belgium, judgment of 5 February 2000, ECHR 2002-I, § 42 ; D.G. v. Ireland, judgment of 16 May 2002, ECHR 2002-III, § 74 ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, § 76 ; Eriksson v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, § 58 and § 71 ; Gnahoré v. France du 19 September 2000, Reports 2000-IX, § 50 ; Hamiyet Kaplan and Others v. Turkey, no. 36749/97, § 67, 13 September 2005 ; Hokkanen v. Finland du 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, pp. 19-20, § 54 ; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, Reports 2000-I ; Johansen v. Norway, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, § 78 ; K.-F. v. Germany, judgment of 27 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2975, § 70 ; Keegan v. Ireland du 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, pp. 17-18, § 44 ; Mokrani v. France, no. 52206/00, 15 July 2003, § 26 ; Moustaquim v. Belgium du 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, § 43 ; Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29 ; Nuutinen v. Finland du 27 June 2000, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Olsson v. Sweden (no 1) du 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 29, § 59 ; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, pp. 3159-3160, § 116 ; Raninen v. Finland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1997-VIII, § 55 ; Selmouni v. France, judgment of 28 July 1999 [GC], § 101, Reports 1999-V ; Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 158, ECHR 2003-X ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, § 78 and § 88 ; Von Hannover v. Germany, judgment of 24 June 2004, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004 ; Weeks v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 23, § 42 ; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17-19, §§ 39 and 45 ; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom du 10 May 2001 [GC], ECHR 2001-V § 73
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-1-f) PREVENT UNAUTHORISED ENTRY INTO COUNTRY" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) TAKE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF THE COUNTRY" "(Art. 8-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 1

MUBILANZILA MAYEKA ET KANIKI MITUNGA c. BELGIQUE

Court (First Section) Decision

26/01/2006

References 41

	10 HAMIYET KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 2, 13, 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/09/2005
	52 VON HANNOVER v. GERMANY 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	24/06/2004
	67 SLIVENKO v. LATVIA 8, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/10/2003
	37 VON HANNOVER contre l'ALLEMAGNE Court (Third Section) Decision	08/07/2003
	47 AMROLLAHI v. DENMARK 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2002
	46 BEYELER v. ITALY Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	28/05/2002
	24 D.G. v. IRELAND 5-1, 5-5, 3, 8, 14, 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/05/2002
	116 CONKA v. BELGIUM 5-1, 5-4, P4-4, 13, 5-2, 3, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/02/2002
	12 ADAM contre l'ALLEMAGNE Court (Fourth Section) Decision	04/10/2001
	77 BOULTIF v. SWITZERLAND 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/08/2001
	19 AMROLLAHI v. DENMARK Court (Second Section) Decision	28/06/2001
	161 Z. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13, 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2001
	94 GNAHORE v. FRANCE 6-1, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	19/09/2000
	132 NUUTINEN v. FINLAND 6-1, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	139 IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/01/2000
	406 BEYELER v. ITALY P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	05/01/2000
	934 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	275 ÇAKICI v. TURKEY 2, 3, 5, 13, 3, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	208 OSMAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 2, 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/10/1998
	83 A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	86 AERTS v. BELGIUM 5-1, 6-1, 5-4, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/07/1998
	49 BOTTA v. ITALY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/02/1998
	145 RANINEN v. FINLAND 5-1, 3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1997
	39 K.-F. v. GERMANY 5-1-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/1997
	14 NSONA v. THE NETHERLANDS 3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	28/11/1996
	370 CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5-4, 13, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	69 JOHANSEN v. NORWAY 8, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/08/1996
	433 AMUUR v. FRANCE 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1996
	216 HOKKANEN v. FINLAND 8, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1994
	172 KEEGAN v. IRELAND 8, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/1994
	109 NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1992
	59 BELDJOUDI v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/03/1992
	125 MOUSTAQUIM v. BELGIUM 8, 14, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/02/1991
	308 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989
	43 ERIKSSON v. SWEDEN 8, 6-1, P1-2, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/06/1989
	49 BOZANO v. FRANCE (ARTICLE 50) Court (Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	02/12/1987
	126 WEEKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-4, 5-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	02/03/1987
	59 BOZANO v. FRANCE 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	18/12/1986
	251 WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-4, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/10/1979
	183 CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM 5-4, 5-1, 4, 3, 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	18/06/1971
	131 DE WILDE, OOMS et VERSYP contre la BELGIQUE COMMISSION Decision	07/04/1967

Show all (41)

	M.P. AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 3, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/2011
	MILANOVIC v. SERBIA 3, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/12/2010
	3 A v. CROATIA 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/10/2010
	1 MUSKHADZHIYEVA AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 3, 5-1, 3, 5-1, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/01/2010
	12 BEGANOVIC v. CROATIA 3, 3, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/2009
	2 QURAISHI c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	12/05/2009
	3 SANDRA JANKOVIC v. CROATIA 8, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/03/2009
	16 DORONIN v. UKRAINE Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/02/2009
	4 SADAYKOV v. BULGARIA 5-1-f, 5-4 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/05/2008
	3 GIUSTO, BORNACIN AND v. v. ITALY Court (Second Section) Decision	15/05/2007

ECHR CaseLaw

MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 41

Citations Breakdown

Citations 11

Similar documents