CROISSANT v. GERMANY
View
Notes
| Date | 25/09/1992 |
| AppNr | 13611/88 |
| Body | Court (Chamber) |
| Type | Judgment (Merits) |
| Articles | 6-1; 6-3-c |
| Violated / NonViolated | 6-16-3-c |
| Citations | 35-46-16-26-36-3-b6-3-c6-3-d813366-16-26-36-3-b6-3-c34 |
- No violation of Art. 6-1
- No violation of Art. 6-3-c
- (art. 6-1) fair hearing
- (art. 6-3) rights of defence
- (art. 6-3-c) free legal assistance
- (art. 6-3-c) legal assistance of his own choosing
Application Documents 1
 |
CROISSANT v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
COMMISSION
Decision
|
08/12/1989 |  |
References 3
|
37
PAKELLI v. GERMANY 
6-3-c
Court (Chamber)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
25/04/1983 | |
|
3
X.v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
Commission (Plenary)
Decision
|
06/05/1982 | |
|
18
LUEDICKE, BELKACEM AND KOÇ v. GERMANY
6-3-e
Court (Chamber)
Judgment (Merits)
|
28/11/1978 | |
Citations Breakdown
- 18 (art. 6) criminal proceedings
- 17 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
- 11 (art. 6-3-c) legal assistance of his own choosing
- 6 (art. 6-3) rights of defence
- 5 (art. 6-3-c) free legal assistance
- 5 (art. 6-1) reasonable time
- 5 (art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
- 5 (art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
- 4 (art. 6-3-d) examination of witnesses
- 4 (art. 3) degrading treatment
- 4 (art. 6-3-b) adequate time
- 3 (art. 6-3-b) access to relevant files
- 3 (art. 6-1) adversarial trial
- 3 (art. 6-3-c) defence in person
- 3 (art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
- 3 (art. 6-1) equality of arms
- 2 (art. 14) discrimination
- 2 (art. 35-1) six month period
- 2 (art. 13) effective remedy
- 2 (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
- 13 Inadmissible
- 5 Violation of Art. 6-1
- 5 Remainder inadmissible
- 4 No violation of Art. 6-1
- 4 Remainder inadmissble
- 3 Remainder admissible
- 3 No violation of Art. 6-3-c
- 3 Partly inadmissible
- 3 Partly admissible
- 3 Non-pecuniary damage - award
- 2 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
- 2 Inacceptable
- 2 Violation of Art. 6-3-c
- 2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
- 2 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
- 1 No violation of Art. 6-3-b
- 1 No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect)
- 1 Violation of Art. 6-3
- 1 No violation of Art. 34
- 1 Violation of Art. 6-3-b
Citations 34
|
ZAGORODNIY v. UKRAINE
6-1, 6-3
Court (Fifth Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
24/11/2011 | |
|
ORLOV v. RUSSIA
3, 13, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 34
Court (First Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
21/06/2011 | |
|
1
OGNYAN ASENOV v. BULGARIA
Court (Fifth Section)
Judgment (Merits)
|
17/02/2011 | |
|
8
PAVLENKO v. RUSSIA
13, 6-1, 6-3-c, 3
Court (First Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
01/04/2010 | |
|
3
VITAN v. ROMANIA
6-2, 8, 6-3, 6-1
Court (Third Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
25/03/2008 | |
|
PAVLENKO c. GRECE
Court (First Section)
Decision
|
06/09/2007 | |
|
9
VOZHIGOV v. RUSSIA
Court (Third Section)
Judgment (Merits)
|
26/04/2007 | |
|
5
ROZHKOV v. RUSSIA
Court (Fifth Section)
Decision
|
05/02/2007 | |
|
6
KLIMENTYEV v. RUSSIA
6
Court (Fifth Section)
Judgment (Merits)
|
16/11/2006 | |
|
MIRONOV v. RUSSIA
Court (First Section)
Decision
|
05/10/2006 | |
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List
Generate Similary List