AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE  View

Notes

• Lack of jurisdiction (complaint inadmissible, new complaint)
• Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (ratione temporis)
• Preliminary objection allowed (victim)

• (art. 34) locus standi
• (art. 34) victim
• (art. 35-3) ratione personae
• (art. 35-3) ratione temporis
• jurisdiction of the court

Application Documents 1

33 AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE COMMISSION Decision

12/02/1992

References 2

	5 KEFALAS AND OTHERS v. GREECE  Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	08/06/1995
	134 HELMERS v. SWEDEN  6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/10/1991

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 68

Sort: Date 

• Date
• Citations
• Importance

Citations 68

	S.C. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL S.R.L. CONSTANTA v. ROMANIA Court (Third Section) Judgment (Revision)	20/12/2011
	GOTCU v. ROMANIA Court (Third Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/2011
	GUBIYEV v. RUSSIA  P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/07/2011
	GLASBERG AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 6-1 Court (Third Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/07/2011
	S.C. GRANITUL S.A. v. ROMANIA P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	22/03/2011
	1 TUNNEL REPORT LIMITED v. FRANCE  P1-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/11/2010
	3 JAFARLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN  6-1, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/07/2010
	BROADHURST INVESTMENTS LIMITED c. ROUMANIE Court (Third Section) Decision	15/06/2010
	SULTANISHVILI v. GEORGIA Court (Second Section) Decision	04/05/2010
	KIN-STIB AND MAJKIC v. SERBIA  P1-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/04/2010

Similar documents

	14 AMAT-G LTD AND MEBAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 13, 17, 29-3, 34, 35-1, 35-3, 35-4, 41, P1-1	27/09/2005
	6 "IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. GEORGIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 13, 29-3, 35-1, 35-3, 35-4, 41, P1-1	27/09/2005
	LIEPAJNIEKS v. LATVIA Decision 6, 6-1, 8, 14, 34, 35, 35-1, 35-3, 57, P1-1, P1-1-1	02/11/2010
	PERSSON v. SWEDEN Decision (Partial) 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, P1-1	03/05/1993
	1 PERSSON v. SWEDEN Decision (Final) 6, 8, 13, P1-1	02/07/1993
	33 AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE Decision P1-1, 6, 13	12/02/1992
	18 CHRYSOSTOMOS, PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU AND LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY Decision 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, P1-1	04/03/1991
	LORDOS AND 12 OTHERS v. TURKEY Decision (Final) P1-1, 1, 8, 13, 14, 35-3	27/06/2000
	33 EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS v. TURKEY Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 1, 8, 13, 14+P1-1, 34, 36-1, P1-1, P4-2, P4-3	31/07/2003
	6 DEMADES v. TURKEY Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 13, 34, 36-1, P1-1	31/07/2003