ECHR Logo

ECHR CaseLaw

Login

AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE  View

Notes

Date24/10/1995
AppNr14807/89
BodyCourt (Chamber)
TypeJudgment (Merits)
Articles13; 6; P1-1
Violated / NonViolated
Citations6-1810P1-18P1-1
Conclusions:
  • Lack of jurisdiction (complaint inadmissible, new complaint)
  • Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (ratione temporis)
  • Preliminary objection allowed (victim)
Keywords:
  • (art. 34) locus standi
  • (art. 34) victim
  • (art. 35-3) ratione personae
  • (art. 35-3) ratione temporis
  • jurisdiction of the court



Application Documents 1

33
AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE
COMMISSION Decision
12/02/1992

References 2

5
KEFALAS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 
Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
08/06/1995
134
HELMERS v. SWEDEN 
6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
29/10/1991

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>
1–10 of 68
Sort: Date 

Citations 68

S.C. CONCORDIA INTERNATIONAL S.R.L. CONSTANTA v. ROMANIA
Court (Third Section) Judgment (Revision)
20/12/2011
GOTCU v. ROMANIA
Court (Third Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/09/2011
GUBIYEV v. RUSSIA 
P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
19/07/2011
GLASBERG AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
6-1 Court (Third Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
05/07/2011
S.C. GRANITUL S.A. v. ROMANIA
P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
22/03/2011
1
TUNNEL REPORT LIMITED v. FRANCE 
P1-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/11/2010
3
JAFARLI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN 
6-1, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
29/07/2010
BROADHURST INVESTMENTS LIMITED c. ROUMANIE
Court (Third Section) Decision
15/06/2010
SULTANISHVILI v. GEORGIA
Court (Second Section) Decision
04/05/2010
KIN-STIB AND MAJKIC v. SERBIA 
P1-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
20/04/2010


 

Similar documents

14
AMAT-G LTD AND MEBAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 13, 17, 29-3, 34, 35-1, 35-3, 35-4, 41, P1-1
27/09/2005
6
"IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. GEORGIA
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 13, 29-3, 35-1, 35-3, 35-4, 41, P1-1
27/09/2005
LIEPAJNIEKS v. LATVIA
Decision 6, 6-1, 8, 14, 34, 35, 35-1, 35-3, 57, P1-1, P1-1-1
02/11/2010
PERSSON v. SWEDEN
Decision (Partial) 3, 5, 6, 8, 13, P1-1
03/05/1993
1
PERSSON v. SWEDEN
Decision (Final) 6, 8, 13, P1-1
02/07/1993
33
AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE
Decision P1-1, 6, 13
12/02/1992
18
CHRYSOSTOMOS, PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU AND LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY
Decision 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, P1-1
04/03/1991
LORDOS AND 12 OTHERS v. TURKEY
Decision (Final) P1-1, 1, 8, 13, 14, 35-3
27/06/2000
33
EUGENIA MICHAELIDOU DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND MICHAEL TYMVIOS v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 1, 8, 13, 14+P1-1, 34, 36-1, P1-1, P4-2, P4-3
31/07/2003
6
DEMADES v. TURKEY
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 13, 34, 36-1, P1-1
31/07/2003