FIRST SECTION

DECISION

Application no. 15125/02 
by Milka BUSIĆ and Others 
against Croatia

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 2 December 2004 as a Chamber composed of

Mr C.L. Rozakis, President
 Mr P. Lorenzen
 Mrs N. Vajić
 Mrs S. Botoucharova
 Mrs E. Steiner
 Mr K. Hajiyev, 
 Mr D. Spielmann, judges
and Mr S. Nielsen, Section Registrar,

Having regard to the above application lodged on 12 March 2002,

Having regard to the decision to apply the procedure under Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits of the case together,

Having regard to the respondent Government's letter dated 1 March 2004, and the applicants' representative's letter dated 21 June 2004,

Having deliberated, decides as follows:

 

THE FACTS

The applicants, Ms Milka Busić, Mr Dušan Busić and Mr Nikola Busić, are Croatian nationals, who were born in 1926, 1947 and 1949, respectively and live in Mladenovac, Serbia and Montenegro (the first and the second applicant) and in Maribor, Slovenia (the third applicant). They are represented before the Court by Mr A. Nobilo, a lawyer practising in Zagreb.

The respondent Government are represented by their Agent, Ms L. Lukina-Karajković.

A.  The circumstances of the case

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 25 January 1992 the applicants' house in Karlovac, Croatia was blown up by unknown perpetrators.

On 15 December 1994 the applicants instituted civil proceedings before the Zagreb Municipal Court (Općinski sud u Zagrebu) seeking damages from the State.

The court held several hearings in 1995.

On 17 January 1996 Parliament introduced an amendment to the Civil Obligations Act which provided that all proceedings concerning actions for damages resulting from terrorist acts were to be stayed pending the enactment of new legislation on the subject.

On 16 May 1996 the Municipal Court stayed the proceedings pursuant to the above legislation.

On 14 July 2003 Parliament passed the Act on Liability for Damage Resulting from Terrorist Acts and Public Demonstrations (Zakon o odgovornosti za štetu nastalu uslijed terorističkih akata i javnih demonstracija, Official Gazette no. 117/2003 of 23 July 2003).

COMPLAINT

The applicants maintained that Parliament's enactment of the 1996 legislation interfered with their right of access to a court within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and their right to an effective remedy within the meaning of Article 13 of the Convention.

THE LAW

By letter of 1 March 2004 the Government informed the Court that they accepted the proposal for a friendly settlement and that the Government would pay the applicants 14,000 euros in full and final settlement of the applicants' claim under the Convention, costs and expenses included.

On 21 June 2004 the applicants' representative informed the Court that the parties had reached a settlement whereby the applicants waived any further claims against Croatia in respect of the facts of the present application.

The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties (Article 39 of the Convention) and considers that the matter has been resolved within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention Rule 62 § 3 of the Rules of Court). Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously

Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.

Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis 
 Registrar President

BUSIĆ v. CROATIA DECISION


BUSIĆ v. CROATIA DECISION