KULIS v. POLAND / ECHR

Notes

Date	18/03/2008
AppNr	15601/02
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 29-3; 41
Violated / NonViolated	10
Citations	6-110

Conclusions:

Non-pecuniary damage - award
Pecuniary damage - award
Violation of Art. 10

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH;POLISH
Application Number	15601/02
Importance Level	2
Represented by	WYROZUMSKA A.
Respondent State	Poland
Date of Judgment	18/03/2008
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 10 ; Pecuniary damage - award ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles	10 , 29-3 , 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Articles 23 and 24 of the Civil Code ; Articles 14 (6), 38 (1) and 40 of the Press Act (1984)
Strasbourg Case Law	Almeida Azevedo v. Portugal, no. 43924/02, § 30, 23 January 2007 ; Busuioc v. Moldova, no. 61513/00, § 101, 21 December 2004 ; Castells v. Spain, judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, § 43, pp. 23-24, § 46 ; Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-IV ; Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 77, § 78, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Hrico v. Slovakia, no. 49418/99, § 49, 20 July 2004 ; Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54 ; Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, § 35 ; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 33, § 43, ECHR 2001-II ; Lindon, Otczakovsky-Laurnes and July v. France, [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 57 ; Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 42 ; Lopes Gomes da Silva v. Portugal, no. 37698/97, § 34, ECHR 2000-X ; Malisiewicz-Gasior v. Poland, no. 43797/98, 6 April 2006 ; Mamère v. France, no. 12697/03, § 25, ECHR 2006-... ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A no. 204, § 57 ; Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, § 38 ; Raichinov v. Bulgaria, no. 47579/99, § 51, 20 April 2006 ; Scharsach and News Verlagsgesellschaft v. Austria, no. 39394/98, § 30, ECHR 2003-XI ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV ; The Observer and The Guardian v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, § 59 ; Turhan v. Turkey, no. 48176/99, § 24, 19 May 2005 ; Vogt v. Germany, judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 323, pp. 25-26, § 52 ; Worm v. Austria, judgment of 29 August 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1551, § 47
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE REPUTATION OF OTHERS" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS"

References 20

	70 LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/10/2007
	4 ALMEIDA AZEVEDO v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/01/2007
	41 MAMERE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)	07/11/2006
	11 TURHAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/05/2005
	31 BUSUIOC v. MOLDOVA 10, 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2004
	3 HRICO v. SLOVAKIA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/07/2004
	38 SCHARSACH AND NEWS VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/11/2003
	58 FELDEK v. SLOVAKIA 10, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/07/2001
	113 JERUSALEM v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/02/2001
	30 LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/2000
	207 NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1999
	172 CEYLAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	223 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/06/1998
	98 VOGT v. GERMANY 10, 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/09/1995
	95 PRAGER AND OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/04/1995
	172 JERSILD v. DENMARK 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1994
	162 CASTELLS v. SPAIN 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1992
	265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1986
	35 X., Y., Z., V., W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	15/12/1967

Show all (20)

1–7 of 7

Citations 7

	CAMYAR AND BERKTAS v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/02/2011
	2 KURLOWICZ v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/06/2010
	9 DLUGOLECKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/02/2009
	2 SAYGILI AND FALAKAOGLU v. TURKEY (No. 2) Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	17/02/2009
	AYHAN ERDOGAN v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/01/2009
	7 DEMIREL AND ATES (NO. 3) v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/12/2008
	1 SAYGILI AND FALAKAOGLU v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/10/2008

ECHR CaseLaw

KULIS v. POLAND View

Notes

ECHR Notes

References 20

Citations Breakdown

Citations 7

Similar documents