GRAFSTRÖM v. SWEDEN  View

Notes

Date29/06/1992
AppNr16792/90
BodyCOMMISSION
TypeDecision
Articles13; 14; 6-1; 8; P4-2-1; P4-2-3
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 14) discrimination
  • (art. 6-1) fair hearing
  • (art. 8-1) respect for family life
  • (art. 8-1) respect for private life
  • (art. 8-2) economic well-being of the country
  • (art. 8-2) interference
  • (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 8-2) prescribed by law
  • (art. 8-2) protection of health
  • (art. 8-2) protection of morals



References 8

26
MARGARETA AND ROGER ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN
8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/02/1992
125
MOUSTAQUIM v. BELGIUM 
8, 14, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/02/1991
59
FREDIN v. SWEDEN (No. 1) 
6-1, P1-1, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/02/1991
112
HÅKANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN 
6-1, 14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/02/1990
132
OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 1) 
8, 6, 3, 14, 8, P1-2, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/03/1988
131
INZE v. AUSTRIA 
14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/10/1987
7
LUNDVALL v. SWEDEN 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
01/12/1985
3
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
06/10/1982
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List