ANKERL v. SWITZERLAND View

Conclusions:

Keywords:

ANKERL v. SWITZERLAND

Commission (Second Chamb… Decision

05/07/1994

	134 REMLI v. FRANCE 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1996
	193 HENTRICH v. FRANCE P1-1, 6-1, 6-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/09/1994
	141 DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/10/1993
	34 DE GEOUFFRE DE LA PRADELLE v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1992

1–10 of 67

	HRDALO v. CROATIA 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/2011
	JURICIC v. CROATIA 6-1, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/07/2011
	TINNER v. SWITZERLAND 5-1-c, 5-3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/04/2011
	LABBE c. FRANCE Court (Fifth Section) Decision	12/10/2010
	3 PERISAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 2, 3, 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/05/2010
	3 ANTOINE VERSINI v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	11/05/2010
	3 KAVAKLIOGLU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE Court (Second Section) Decision	05/01/2010
	RAYKOV v. BULGARIA 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/10/2009
	9 GLOR v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/04/2009
	11 CARLSON v. SWITZERLAND 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/11/2008

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports 1996-V
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH
Application Number	17748/91
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Switzerland
Referred by	Commission ; Switzerland
Date of Reference	10/07/1995
	28/08/1995
Date of Judgment	23/10/1996
Conclusion	Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+6-1
Articles	6-1 , 14 , 35-1
Rules of Court	A
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Canton of Geneva Civil Proceedings Act of 10 April 1987, Articles 225 para. 1 and 226
Strasbourg Case Law	De Geouffre de la Pradelle v. France judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 253-B, p. 40, para. 26 ; Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, paras. 32-33 ; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 17, para. 30 ; Remli v. France judgment of 23 April 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-II, p. 571, para. 33 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, para. 69
External Sources	Civil Code, Article 641 para. 2 ; Canton of Geneva Civil Proceedings Act of 10 April 1987, Articles 196, 222 para. 1, 225 and 226 ; Federal Judicature Act of 16 December 1943, section 90
Keywords	"(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING"

ECHR CaseLaw