BUITRAGO MONTES AND PEREZ LOPEZ v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date02/12/1992
AppNr18077/91
BodyCOMMISSION
TypeDecision
Articles13; 14; 3; 5-1; 5-2; 5-3; 6-1; 6-2; 6-3; 6-3-a; 6-3-b; 6-3-c; 6-3-d; 6-3-e; 7-1; 8; P1-1
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 14) discrimination
  • (art. 6-1) fair hearing
  • (art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
  • (art. 6-3-b) adequate time
  • (art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
  • (art. 6-3-e) free assistance of interpreter
  • (art. 8-1) respect for family life
  • (art. 8-2) interference



References 7

1
HARWARD v. NORWAY
COMMISSION Decision
12/03/1990
1
D. S. v. UNITED KINGDOM
COMMISSION Decision
06/07/1989
419
COMPANY X. v. AUSTRIA
Commission (Plenary) Decision
13/12/1979
10
X., Y. and Z. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
08/12/1979
1
Y. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
14/05/1977
201
X. v. SWEDEN 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
08/02/1973
3
X. contre la BELGIQUE 
COMMISSION Decision
18/12/1963

Citations 2

JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
Court (Fifth Section) Decision
05/07/2011
KAPITONOVS v. LATVIA
Court (Third Section) Decision (Partial)
05/04/2007


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List