SIEBENHAAR v. GERMANY View

Notes

Date	03/02/2011
AppNr	18136/02
Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	14; 35; 35-1; 9; 9-1
Violated / NonViolated	9

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 9
Remainder inadmissible

Keywords:

(art. 14) discrimination
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 9-1) freedom of religion
margin of appreciation
positive obligations

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	18136/02
Importance Level	2
Represented by	KLEINE-COSACK M.
Respondent State	Germany
Date of Judgment	03/02/2011
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 9 ; Remainder inadmissible
Articles	9 ; 9-1 ; 14 ; 35 ; 35-1
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Article 6 § 3 des réglementations relatives au fondement des relations de service des collaborateurs de l’Eglise protestante de Bade et de la diaconie de l’Eglise protestante de Bade
Strasbourg Case Law	Adam and Others v. Germany (dec.), no 290/03, 1er September 2005 ; Ahtinen v. Finland, no 48907/99, 23 September 2008 ; Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no 200 ; Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no 6339/05, ECHR 2007-IV ; Finska Församlingen i Stockholm and Teuvo Hautaniemi v. Sweden, no 24019/94, decision of the Commission of 11 April 1996, Decisions and Rapports (DR) 85-B, p. 94 ; Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no 39293/98, § 38, 29 February 2000 ; Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no 30985/96, §§ 62 and 78, ECHR 2000-XI ; Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 993, Series A no 260-A ; Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no 44774/98, § 109, ECHR 2005-XI ; Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no 39128/05, § 41, ECHR 2009-... ; Marchitan v. Germany (dec.), no 22448/07, 19 January 2010 ; Membres (97) de la Congrégation des témoins de Jéhovah de Gldani v. Georgia, no 71156/01, ECHR 2007-V ; Obst v. Germany, no 425/03, § 45, ECHR 2010-... (extracts) ; Özgür Gündem v. Turkey, no 23144/93, ECHR 2000-III ; Predota v. Austria (dec.), no 28962/95, 18 January 2000 ; Rommelfanger v. Germany, no 12242/86, decision of the Commission of 6 September 1989, DR 62, p. 151 ; Schüth v. Germany, no 1620/03, § 59, ECHR 2010-...
Keywords	"(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 9-1) FREEDOM OF RELIGION" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"

References 15

	3 OBST v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/2010
	2 SCHÜTH v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	23/09/2010
	4 MARCHITAN v. GERMANY Court (Fifth Section) Decision	19/01/2010
	8 LOMBARDI VALLAURI v. ITALY 10, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2009
	8 97 MEMBERS OF THE GLDANI CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND 4 OTHERS v. GEORGIA 3, 9, 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/05/2007
	39 EVANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2, 8, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	07/03/2006
	57 LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY 9, P1-2, 8, 10, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	10/11/2005
	5 ADAM AND OTHERS v. GERMANY Court (Third Section) Decision	01/09/2005
	4 AHTINEN v. FINLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	31/05/2005
	72 HASAN AND CHAUSH v. BULGARIA 9, 13, 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	54 OZGUR GUNDEM v. TURKEY 10, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/03/2000
	41 FUENTES BOBO v. SPAIN 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/02/2000
	3 PREDOTA v. AUSTRIA Court (Third Section) Decision	18/01/2000
	505 CARDOT v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/03/1991
	10 ROMMELFANGER v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY COMMISSION Decision	06/09/1989

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List