U.R.P. v. AUSTRIA  View

Notes

Date02/03/1994
AppNr18640/91; 19574/92
BodyCommission (Second Chamber)
TypeDecision
Articles6-1; 6-3-b; 6-3-d
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 6-1) criminal charge
  • (art. 6-1) determination (civil)
  • (art. 6-1) fair hearing
  • (art. 6-3-b) adequate time
  • (art. 6-3-d) examination of witnesses



References 7

79
BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA 
6-1, 6-1, 6-3-d, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/08/1991
174
HAUSCHILDT v. DENMARK 
6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/05/1989
126
UNTERPERTINGER v. AUSTRIA 
6-3-d, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/11/1986
26
JESPERS v. BELGIUM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
15/10/1980
54
X. v. AUSTRIA
Commission (Plenary) Decision
08/05/1978
400
ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 
5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 6, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
08/06/1976
4
X. v. THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
13/07/1970
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List