SMATANA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC View

Notes

Date	27/09/2007
AppNr	18642/04
Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 29-3; 35-1; 41; 5-3; 5-4; 5-5
Violated / NonViolated	5-35-45-5
Citations	35-15-1-c5-35-45-56-16-26-3-c6-3-d8135-334

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
No separate issue under Art. 13
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Violation of Art. 5-3
Violation of Art. 5-4
Violation of Art. 5-5

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 5-3) length of pre-trial detention
(art. 5-3) reasonableness of pre-trial detention
(art. 5-4) review of lawfulness of detention
(art. 5-4) speediness of review
(art. 5-5) compensation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	18642/04
Importance Level	2
Represented by	KOTEK V.
Respondent State	the Czech Republic
Date of Introduction	21/05/2004
Date of Judgment	27/09/2007
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 5-5 ; No separate issue under Art. 13 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles	5-3 ; 5-4 ; 5-5 ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	Aquilina v. Malta [GC], no. 25642/94, § 39, ECHR 1999-III ; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, § 68 and § 85, 28 March 2000, ECHR 2000-III ; Chahal v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, § 127 ; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI ; Delbec v. France, no. 43125/98, § 30, 18 June 2002 ; Hartman v. the Czech Republic, no. 53341/99, § 68, ECHR 2003-VIII (extracts) ; Hüseyin Esen v. Turkey, no. 49048/99, § 68 and § 71, 8 August 2006 ; Ila?cu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC] (dec.), no. 48787/99, 4 July 2001 ; Koendjbiharie v. the Netherlands, judgment of 25 October 1990, Series A no. 185-B, § 28 ; Kolanis v. the United Kingdom, no. 517/02, § 88, ECHR 2005 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 147, ECHR 2000-IV ; Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 43 and § 56 ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 49, 20 January 2005 ; Musial v. Poland [GC], no. 24557/94, § 43, ECHR 1999-II ; N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 49, ECHR 2002-X ; Navarra v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 273-B, §§ 24, 28 and 29 ; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 83, ECHR 1999-VI ; Pavletic v. Slovakia (no 39359/98, §§ 61 and 69-74, 22 June 2004 ; R.M.D. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, § 42 ; Rapacciuolo v. Italy, no. 76024/01, § 31, 19 May 2005 ; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, § 60, 7 April 2005 ; Schöps v. Germany, no. 25116/94, § 47, ECHR 2001-I ; Scott v. Spain du 30 November 1996, ECHR 1996-VI, § 78 ; Singh v. the Czech Republic, no. 60538/00, § 74, 25 January 2005 ; Sulaoja v. Estonia, no. 55939/00, § 52, 15 February 2005 ; Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 107, ECHR 2006 (extracts) ; Tariq v. the Czech Republic, no. 75455/01, §§ 87-88, 18 April 2006 ; Vejmola v. the Czech Republic, no. 57246/00, § 45 and § 48, 25 October 2005
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-3) LENGTH OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-3) REASONABLENESS OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) SPEEDINESS OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-5) COMPENSATION"

References 28

	7 HUSEYIN ESEN v. TURKEY 3, 13, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/08/2006
	3 TARIQ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-3, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/04/2006
	66 SVIPSTA v. LATVIA 5-1, 11, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/03/2006
	2 VEJMOLA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/10/2005
	5 KOLANIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-4, 5-5, 5-1-e Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2005
	14 RAPACCIUOLO v. ITALY 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/05/2005
	105 ROKHLINA v. RUSSIA 5-3, 6-1, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/04/2005
	51 SULAOJA v. ESTONIA 5-3, 5-4, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/02/2005
	26 SINGH v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-1-f, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/01/2005
	115 ILASCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 3, 5, 3, 5, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/2004
	22 PAVLETIC v. SLOVAKIA 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/06/2004
	108 HARTMAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6-1, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/07/2003
	90 N.C. v. ITALY 5-5 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	18/12/2002
	21 DELBEC v. FRANCE 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/06/2002
	27 SCHÖPS v. GERMANY 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/02/2001
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	174 BARANOWSKI v. POLAND 5-1, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/03/2000
	202 ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/1999
	458 DALBAN v. ROMANIA 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/1999
	100 AQUILINA v. MALTA 5-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/04/1999
	60 MUSIAL v. POLAND 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	32 R.M.D. v. SWITZERLAND 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/09/1997
	84 SCOTT v. SPAIN 5-3, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	370 CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5-4, 13, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	84 NAVARRA v. FRANCE 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	23/11/1993
	247 LETELLIER v. FRANCE 5-3, 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/06/1991
	19 KOENDJBIHARIE v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/10/1990

Show all (28)

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 18

Citations 18

	ZUBOR v. SLOVAKIA 5-1, 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/12/2011
	KOVACIK v. SLOVAKIA 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/11/2011
	KORMOS v. SLOVAKIA 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/11/2011
	3 AYDEMIR v. SLOVAKIA 5-4, 5-5 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/02/2011
	4 MICHALKO v. SLOVAKIA 5-3, 5-4, 5-5 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	4 KNEBL v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-4, 5-3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/10/2010
	4 ROSSELET-CHRIST v. SLOVAKIA 5-3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2010
	4 ŽIROVNICKÝ v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-1, 5-4, 5-5 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/09/2010
	HARTMAN c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE Court (Fifth Section) Decision	09/03/2010
	1 CRABTREE v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-1-c, 5-5 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/02/2010

ECHR CaseLaw

SMATANA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC View

Notes

ECHR Notes

References 28

Citations Breakdown

Citations 18

Similar documents