AHMUT v. THE NETHERLANDS View

Notes

Date	28/11/1996
AppNr	21702/93
Body	Court (Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	8
Violated / NonViolated	8
Citations	6-18136-1813

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 8-1) respect for family life
(art. 8-2) interference
(p1-1-2) general interest
margin of appreciation
positive obligations

Application Documents 1

AHMUT v. THE NETHERLANDS

Commission (Second Chamb… Decision

12/10/1994

References 3

	69 GÜL v. SWITZERLAND 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/02/1996
	101 BERREHAB v. THE NETHERLANDS 8, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/1988
	264 ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 14, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/05/1985

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 49

Citations 49

	ARVELO APONTE v. THE NETHERLANDS 8, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/11/2011
	1 NUNEZ v. NORWAY 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	OSMAN v. DENMARK 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/06/2011
	MENGESHA KIMFE v. SWITZERLAND 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/07/2010
	1 NARENJI HAGHIGHI v. THE NETHERLANDS Court (Third Section) Decision	14/04/2009
	1 SADET c. ROUMANIE Court (Third Section) Decision	20/09/2007
	GRIGORIAN AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN Court (Third Section) Decision	05/07/2007
	8 MUSA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA 8, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/01/2007
	3 PRIYA v. DENMARK Court (First Section) Decision	06/07/2006
	11 SHEVANOVA v. LATVIA 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/06/2006

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports 1996-VI
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	21702/93
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	the Netherlands
Referred by	Commission ; Netherlands
Date of Reference	13/09/1995
	05/10/1995
Date of Judgment	28/11/1996
Applicability	Art. 8 applicable
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 8
Articles	8
Rules of Court	B
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	1982 Aliens Circular, Chapters A4, para. 3.3 and B19, paras. 1.1, 1.2, 2.1.2.1 and 2.1.2
Strasbourg Case Law	Berrehab v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 138 ; Gül v. Switzerland judgment of 19 February 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-I, pp. 173-174, para. 32, pp. 174-175, para. 38
External Sources	Aliens Act, sections 6 (1), 7, 8, 9, 11 (1) and (2), 13, 22, 29 (1) and (2), 31 (1), 32 (2) and 34 (3) ; Aliens Ordinance, sections 1, 41 (1), 46 and 52 ; Sovereign Ordinance of 12 December 1813, section 7 ; Aliens Schedule, sections 24 and 28 (4) ; 1982 Aliens Circular, Chapter A4, para. 5.1.1.1 ; 1984 Border Guarding Circular ; Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, United Nations Treaty Series - UNTS - no. 2545, vol. 198, pp. 137 et seq., Article 1 A ; Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees of 31 January 1967, UNTS no. 8791, vol. 606, pp. 267 et seq., Article 1
Keywords	"(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(P1-1-2) GENERAL INTEREST" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS" PROPORTIONALITY

ECHR CaseLaw