McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date09/06/1998
AppNr21825/93; 23414/94
BodyCourt (Chamber)
TypeJudgment (Merits)
Articles13; 6-1; 8
Violated / NonViolated6-18
Conclusions:
  • No violation of Art. 6-1
  • No violation of Art. 8
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 13
  • Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 6-1) access to court
  • (art. 8-1) respect for family life
  • (art. 8-1) respect for private life
  • positive obligations



Application Documents 2

McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (REVISION) 
Court (First Section) Judgment (Revision)
28/01/2000
McGINLEY AND EGAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
28/11/1995

References 6

172
GUERRA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 
8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
19/02/1998
63
KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA 
6-3-c, 6-1, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/09/1993
32
GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
8, 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
07/07/1989
17
GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
Commission (Plenary) Decision
23/01/1986
305
AIREY v. IRELAND 
6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
09/10/1979
9
AIREY v. IRELAND
Commission (Plenary) Decision
07/07/1977

Citations 1

WERNER v. POLAND
Commission (Plenary) Decision (Final)
19/01/1998


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List