N. and subsequently I.L. v. SWEDEN  View

Notes

Date29/11/1995
AppNr22836/93
BodyCommission (Second Chamber)
TypeDecision
Articles13; 2-1; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible
Keywords:
  • (art. 13) effective remedy
  • (art. 2-1) life



References 9

21
ISILTAN v. TURKEY
Commission (Plenary) Decision
22/05/1995
77
LÓPEZ OSTRA v. SPAIN 
8, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/12/1994
20
A. v. FRANCE 
8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
23/11/1993
90
FUNKE v. FRANCE 
6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/02/1993
2
TAVARES contre la FRANCE
COMMISSION Decision
12/09/1991
285
POWELL AND RAYNER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
21/02/1990
5
KANTHAK v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
COMMISSION Decision
11/10/1988
150
LEANDER v. SWEDEN 
8, 10, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
26/03/1987
14
ASSOCIATION OF PARENTS V. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
12/07/1978
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List