BASKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY View

Notes

Date	08/07/1999
AppNr	23536/94; 24408/94
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 14; 3; 35-1; 41; 6-2; 7; 9
Violated / NonViolated	6-17107
Citations	236-1781013235-36-114

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14
Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3
No violation of Art. 7
No violation of Art. 7 (first applicant)
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Not necessary to examine Art. 14+10
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-2
Pecuniary damage - financial award
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion)
Violation of Art. 10
Violation of Art. 6-1
Violation of Art. 6-1 (independence and impartiality)
Violation of Art. 7
Violation of Art. 7 (second applicant)

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) accessibility
(art. 10-2) foreseeability
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) national security
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) prevention of crime
(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
(art. 10-2) territorial integrity
(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 7) no punishment without law
(art. 7-1) nulla poena sine lege
(art. 7-1) nullum crimen sine lege
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-IV
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH;SLOVENIAN
Application Number	23536/94 ; 24408/94
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Turkey
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	17/03/1998
Date of Judgment	08/07/1999
Conclusion	Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3 ; Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14 ; No violation of Art. 7 (first applicant) ; Violation of Art. 7 (second applicant) ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 (independence and impartiality) ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-2 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+10 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	3 ; 6-2 ; 7 ; 9 ; 10 ; 14 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713 of 12 April 1991), sections 8(1) and 8(2)
Strasbourg Case Law	Huvig v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 25, § 37 ; Kruslin v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 57, § 36 ; Olsson v. Sweden (no. 2) judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp. 30-31, § 75 ; Tolstoy v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, p. 83, § 77 ; S.W. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, pp. 41-42, § 35 ; C.R. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-C, pp. 68-69, § 33 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports"), 1996-IV, p. 1210, § 67 ; Cantoni v. France judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1627, § 29 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1957, § 58 ; Zana v. Turkey judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2539, §§ 10-11, pp. 2547-2548, § 51 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54, p. 1568, § 58, p. 1571, §§ 65, 68, p. 1572, § 70, p. 1573, § 72 in fine ; Hertel v. Switzerland judgment of 25 August 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2331-2332, § 50 ; Aytekin v. Turkey judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2825, § 77 ; Çiraklar v. Turkey judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 3072-3073, § 38 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21 January 1999, § 45 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria judgment of 25 March 1999, § 79
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) ACCESSIBILITY" "(Art. 10-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 7) NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT LAW" "(Art. 7-1) NULLA POENA SINE LEGE" "(Art. 7-1) NULLUM CRIMEN SINE LEGE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 2

	OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	14/10/1996
	BASKAYA v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	02/09/1996

Google

References 15

	102 ZANA contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	15/02/2000
	22 KARATAS v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	223 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	565 NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	58 AYTEKIN v. TURKEY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)	23/09/1998
	171 HERTEL v. SWITZERLAND 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/08/1998
	359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/06/1998
	76 ZANA v. TURKEY 6-1, 6-3-c, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1997
	61 WINGROVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/11/1996
	68 CANTONI v. FRANCE 7 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	15/11/1996
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	52 C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/11/1995
	176 TOLSTOY MILOSLAVSKY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/1995
	52 OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 2) 8, 6-1, 6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/1992

Show all (15)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 38

Citations 38

	NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN v. TURKEY 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2011
	1 MANDIC AND JOVIC v. SLOVENIA 3, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2011
	STRUCL AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA 3, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/10/2011
	S.I. v. SLOVENIA 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/10/2011
	7 GASPARI v. SLOVENIA 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/07/2009
	1 AYLA OZCAN v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/02/2009
	5 USTUN v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2007
	VEREINIGUNG BILDENDER KUNSTLER v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/01/2007
	WITT v. GERMANY Court (Fifth Section) Decision	08/01/2007
	4 STARK AND OTHERS v. FINLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	05/12/2006

ECHR CaseLaw

BASKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

Google

References 15

Citations Breakdown

Citations 38

Similar documents