AYALA contre le PORTUGAL  View

Notes

Date23/05/1995
AppNr23663/94
BodyCommission (Plenary)
TypeDecision
Articles14; 3; 6; 6-1; 6-3-a; 6-3-d; 6-3-e; 8
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Remainder admissible
  • Remainder inadmissble
Keywords:
  • (art. 3) inhuman treatment
  • (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • (art. 6-1) fair hearing
  • (art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
  • (art. 8-1) respect for private life
  • (art. 8-2) interference
  • (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 8-2) prevention of crime
  • (art. 8-2) prevention of disorder



References 5

2
VAN KUYK v. GRECE
COMMISSION Decision
03/07/1991
25
DUPUIS v. BELGIQUE
COMMISSION Decision
08/09/1988
125
JOHNSTON AND OTHERS v. IRELAND 
8, 8, 12, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/12/1986
16
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
29/09/1975
44
X. contre la BELGIQUE 
COMMISSION Decision
12/03/1962
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List