ECHR CaseLaw
Login
Home
Search
Statistics
OkCon Stats
About
X. v. AUSTRIA
View
Notes
Date
11/02/1967
AppNr
2370/64
Body
Commission (Plenary)
Type
Decision
Articles
13
;
14
;
15
;
3
;
5
;
6
;
8
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
Inadmissible
Keywords:
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
(art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
ECHR Notes
ECHR Notes
Originating Body
Commission (Plenary)
Document Type
DECISION
Published in
Collection 22, pp. 96-102
Application Number
2370/64
Importance Level
1
Represented by
B. ; lawyer
Respondent State
Austria
N/A
Date of Decision
11/02/1967
Conclusion
Inadmissible
Articles
3 ; 5 ; 6 ; 8 ; 13 ; 14 ; 15
Keywords
"(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE FACILITIES" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE TIME" "(Art. 6-3-b) PREPARATION OF DEFENCE"
References
0
Citations Breakdown
Keyword
Article
Conclusion
Country
Map
Year
1
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
1
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
1
(art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
1
(art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
1
(art. 6-3-d) obtain attendance of witnesses
1
3
1
6-3-b
1
6-3-c
1
6-3-d
1
Inadmissible
1
United Kingdom
1
1970
1–1
of
1
Sort: Date
Date
Citations
Importance
Citations
1
×
Keyword
: (art. 6-2) charged with a criminal offence
X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary)
Decision
02/02/1970
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List