ECHR CaseLaw
Login
Home
Search
Statistics
OkCon Stats
About
X. v. AUSTRIA
View
Notes
Date
11/02/1967
AppNr
2370/64
Body
Commission (Plenary)
Type
Decision
Articles
13
;
14
;
15
;
3
;
5
;
6
;
8
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
Inadmissible
Keywords:
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-3-b) adequate facilities
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
(art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
ECHR Notes
ECHR Notes
Originating Body
Commission (Plenary)
Document Type
DECISION
Published in
Collection 22, pp. 96-102
Application Number
2370/64
Importance Level
1
Represented by
B. ; lawyer
Respondent State
Austria
N/A
Date of Decision
11/02/1967
Conclusion
Inadmissible
Articles
3 ; 5 ; 6 ; 8 ; 13 ; 14 ; 15
Keywords
"(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE FACILITIES" "(Art. 6-3-b) ADEQUATE TIME" "(Art. 6-3-b) PREPARATION OF DEFENCE"
References
0
Citations Breakdown
Keyword
Article
Conclusion
Country
Map
Year
1
(art. 6-3-d) obtain attendance of witnesses
1
(art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
1
(art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
1
(art. 6-3-b) adequate time
1
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
1
6-3-d
1
6-3-c
1
6-3-b
1
3
1
Inadmissible
1
United Kingdom
1
1970
1–1
of
1
Sort: Date
Date
Citations
Importance
Citations
1
×
Keyword
: (art. 6-2) charged with a criminal offence
X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary)
Decision
02/02/1970
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List
X. v. AUSTRIA
View
United Kingdom