SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 2) View

Notes

Date	08/07/1999
AppNr	24122/94
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 35-1; 41; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6-110
Citations	66-110131014

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - financial award
Preliminary objections rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, estoppel)
Violation of Art. 10
Violation of Art. 6-1

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) national security
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
(art. 10-2) territorial integrity
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
(art. 6-1) independent tribunal
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH
Application Number	24122/94
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Turkey
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	17/03/1998
Date of Judgment	08/07/1999
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 10 ; Preliminary objections rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, estoppel) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	6-1 , 10 , 35-1 , 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713 of 12 April 1991), section 6 ; Constitution, Articles 143, 145 ; Law no. 2845 on the creation and rules of procedure of the National Security Courts, sections 5, 6 and 34
Strasbourg Case Law	Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, §§ 41-42 ; Weber v. Switzerland judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, p. 23, § 51 ; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 34-35, §§ 69-71 ; Sunday Times (no. 2) v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, pp. 30-31, §§ 54-56 ; Castells v. Spain judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 24, §§ 47-48 ; Jersild v. Denmark judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 23, § 31 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-V, p. 1957, § 58 ; Zana v. Turkey judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2539, § 10, pp. 2546-2547, §§ 49, 50, pp. 2547-2548, § 51 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54, p. 1571, §§ 65, 68, p. 1572, § 70, p. 1573, § 72 in fine ; Aytekin v. Turkey judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2831, § 77 ; Çiraklar v. Turkey judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 3072-3073, § 38 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21 January 1999, § 45 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria judgment of 25 March 1999, § 79
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" "(Art. 10-2) TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 1

SUREK v. TURKEY

Commission (Plenary) Decision

02/09/1996

References 13

	9 GERGER contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision (Partial)	14/11/2000
	102 ZANA contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	15/02/2000
	190 GERGER v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	565 NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	58 AYTEKIN v. TURKEY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)	23/09/1998
	359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/06/1998
	76 ZANA v. TURKEY 6-1, 6-3-c, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1997
	61 WINGROVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/11/1996
	172 JERSILD v. DENMARK 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1994
	162 CASTELLS v. SPAIN 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1992
	131 WEBER v. SWITZERLAND 6-1, 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/05/1990
	265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1986

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 15

Citations 15

	FATIH TAS v. TURKEY 10, 6-1, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/04/2011
	ALEKSEY OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/2010
	6 SAYGILI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/01/2008
	1 SAYGILI AND SEYMAN v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/06/2007
	5 EMIR v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/05/2007
	2 FALAKAOGLU AND SAYGILI v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/12/2006
	3 ERBAKAN v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits)	06/07/2006
	3 KORKMAZ v. TURKEY (No. 2) 6, 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2005
	ERKANLI v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)	13/02/2003
	ÖZKAN KILIC v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)	26/11/2002

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List