STEEL AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	23/09/1998
AppNr	24838/94
Body	Court (Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 11; 13; 41; 5-1; 5-5; 6-3-a
Violated / NonViolated	5-1105-15-56-3-a10
Citations	2355-15-1-e5-1-f5-25-35-45-56-16-36-3-b6-3-c7-11011131434P7-2235-15-25-35-466-16-26-3-c111434

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 10
No violation of Art. 10 (first applicant)
No violation of Art. 10 (second applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-1
No violation of Art. 5-1 (first and second applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-1 (second applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-5
No violation of Art. 6-3-a
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Not necessary to examine Art. 11
Not necessary to examine Art. 13
Not necessary to examine Art. 5-3
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-2
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-c
Violation of Art. 10
Violation of Art. 10 (third
Violation of Art. 5-1
Violation of Art. 5-1 (third
Violation of Art. fourth
Violation of Art. fourth and fifth applicant)
Violation of Art. fourth and fifth applicants)

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) foreseeability
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
(art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
(art. 5-1-b) non-compliance with court order
(art. 5-1-b) secure fulfilment of obligation prescribed by law
(art. 5-1-c) criminal offence
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports 1998-VII
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	24838/94
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	the United Kingdom
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	09/07/1997
Date of Judgment	23/09/1998
Conclusion	Not necessary to examine Art. 5-3 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-2 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-c ; Not necessary to examine Art. 11 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant) ; No violation of Art. 5-1 (second applicant) ; Violation of Art. 5-1 (third, fourth and fifth applicant) ; No violation of Art. 5-1 (first and second applicant) ; No violation of Art. 5-5 ; No violation of Art. 6-3-a ; No violation of Art. 10 (first applicant) ; No violation of Art. 10 (second applicant) ; Violation of Art. 10 (third, fourth and fifth applicants) ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	5-1 ; 5-5 ; 6-3-a ; 10 ; 11 ; 13 ; 41
Rules of Court	A
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	R. v. County Quarter Sessions Appeals Committee, ex parte Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1948] 1 King's Bench Reports p. 260 ; Judgment in the Court of Appeal in the case of R. v. Howell [1982] 1 Queen's Bench Reports p. 416, at p. 427 ; R. v. Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, ex parte Central Electricity Generating Board [1982] Queen's Bench Reports p. 458, at p. 471 ; Percy v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1995] 1 Weekly Law Reports p. 1382 ; Nicol and Selvanayagam v. Director of Public Prosecutions [1996] Justice of the Peace Reports p. 155, at p. 163 ; Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, sections 17(6) and 25(6) ; Justices of the Peace Act 1361 ; Magistrates' Courts Act 1980, section 115 ; R. v. Morpeth Ward Justices, ex parte Ward [1992] 95 Criminal Appeal Reports p. 215
Strasbourg Case Law	Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1) judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, § 49, p. 34, § 55 ; Olsson v. Sweden (no. 1) judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 28, § 56 ; Brozicek v. Italy judgment of 19 December 1989, Series A no. 167, pp. 18-19, § 42 ; Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland judgment of 29 October 1992, Series A no. 246-A, p. 23, § 46 ; Chorherr v. Austria judgment of 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-B, p. 35, § 23, p. 37, § 31 ; S.W. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, pp. 41-42, §§ 35-36 ; Benham v. the United Kingdom judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-III, pp. 752-753, § 40, § 41, p. 755, § 50, p. 756, § 56 ; Stallinger and Kuso v. Austria judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports 1997-II, p. 680, § 52 ; Halford v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 June 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 1017, § 49 ; Larissis and Others v. Greece judgment of 24 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 377, § 34 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1566, § 46
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1-b) NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER" "(Art. 5-1-b) SECURE FULFILMENT OF OBLIGATION PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-1-c) CRIMINAL OFFENCE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION"

Application Documents 1

STEEL, LUSH, NEEDHAM, POLDEN, COLE AND SCHWARZ v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Commission (First Chambe… Decision

26/06/1996

References 10

	359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/06/1998
	17 LARISSIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 9, 7, 9, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/02/1998
	97 HALFORD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1997
	41 STALLINGER AND KUSO v. AUSTRIA 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1997
	184 BENHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-3-c, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/06/1996
	43 S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/11/1995
	30 CHORHERR v. AUSTRIA 5, 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/08/1993
	52 OLSSON v. SWEDEN (No. 2) 8, 6-1, 6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/1992
	58 OPEN DOOR AND DUBLIN WELL WOMAN v. IRELAND 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/10/1992
	48 BROZICEK v. ITALY 6-1, 6-3-a Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/12/1989

Show all (10)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 74

Citations 74

	POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA 5-1, 5-3, 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2011
	OSHURKO v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/09/2011
	1 SEBALJ v. CROATIA 5-1, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	KRNJAK v. CROATIA 5-4, 5-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	BERNOBIC v. CROATIA 5-4, 5-1, 5-3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	2 NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/04/2011
	ELMURATOV v. RUSSIA 5-1, 5-4, 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/03/2011
	SOARE AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 2, 13, 3, 14, 2, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/2011
	1 A.B. v. RUSSIA 3, 5-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/10/2010
	MURUKIN v. UKRAINE 5-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/09/2010

ECHR CaseLaw

STEEL AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 10

Citations Breakdown

Citations 74

Similar documents