SADAK v. TURKEY  View

Notes

Date08/04/2004
AppNr25142/94; 27099/95
BodyCourt (Third Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles15; 3; 35-1; 37-1-b; 41; 5-3
Violated / NonViolated5-33
Conclusions:
  • Costs and expenses partial award
  • No violation of Art. 3
  • Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
  • Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
  • Preliminary objections rejected (application substantially the same
  • Violation of Art. 5-3
  • non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Keywords:
  • (art. 15-1) derogation
  • (art. 3) inhuman treatment
  • (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
  • (art. 35-2) same as matter submitted to other procedure
  • (art. 5-3) brought promptly before judge or other officer



Application Documents 1

SADAK contre la TURQUIE
Commission (Plenary) Decision (Final)
30/06/1997

References 8

179
KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA 
Court (Third Section) Decision
18/09/2001
77
SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 
6-1, 6-3-a, 6-3-b, 6-3-d Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
17/07/2001
1907
KUDLA v. POLAND 
5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/10/2000
25
SADAK et AUTRES, TOGUC, GÜNES, KILINC, AYDAR, YIGIT, KARTAL, SADAK et YURTTAS contre la TURQUIE 
Court (Third Section) Decision
30/05/2000
105
MESSINA v. ITALY 
Court (Second Section) Decision
08/06/1999
153
MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
5-1, 5-2, 5-5, 8, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/10/1994
298
BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
5-3, 5-5, 5-1, 5-4 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
29/11/1988
924
IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/01/1978
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List