IWANCZUK v. POLAND View

Notes

Date	15/11/2001
AppNr	25196/94
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	3; 41; 5-3; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	35-36-1
Citations	35-15-35-45-56-18101335-15-35-56-1813

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Violation of Art. 3
Violation of Art. 5-3
Violation of Art. 6-1

Keywords:

(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 5-3) guarantees to appear for trial
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) reasonable time

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH;POLISH
Application Number	25196/94
Importance Level	2
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Poland
Date of Judgment	15/11/2001
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award
Articles	3 ; 5-3 ; 6-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Section 11 of Rules of Detention on Remand of 1989 ; Ordinance of the Minister of Justice of 6 March 1974 on Prison Security
Strasbourg Case Law	Application no. 8339/78, report of the European Commission of Human Rights of 11 December 1980, Decisions and reports no. 23, p. 137 ; Brumarescu v. Romania (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 28342/95, 23.1.2001, § 30, ECHR 2001-... ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, 6.3.2001, § 44, ECHR 2001-... ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162, pp. 66-67, § 167 ; Kudla v. Poland [G.C.], no. 30210/96, 26.10.2000, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, 6.4.2000, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Neumeister v. Austria judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A n° 8, p. 40, § 14 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, 19.4.2001, §§ 67-68, 74, ECHR 2001-... ; Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, 26.3.1999, § 67, ECHR 1999-II ; Philis v. Greece (no. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1083, § 35 ; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 ; 33986/96, 27.9.1999, § 120, ECHR 1999-VI ; Tomasi v. France judgment of 27 August 1992, Series A no. 241-A, pp. 40-41, §§ 113-115 ; Tyrer v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no. 26, p. 16, § 32 ; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no.44558/98, 24.7.2001, § 101, ECHR 2001-...
Keywords	"(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-3) GUARANTEES TO APPEAR FOR TRIAL" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME"

Application Documents 1

12

IWANCZUK v. POLAND

Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Partial)

09/11/2000

Google

References 9

	235 PEERS v. GREECE 3, 8, 6-2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2001
	2 BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA (ARTICLE 41) Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	23/01/2001
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	133 DOUGOZ v. GREECE Court (Third Section) Decision	08/02/2000
	1002 PÉLISSIER AND SASSI v. FRANCE 6-3-a, 6-1, 6-3-b Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	75 COSTELLO-ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1993
	235 TOMASI v. FRANCE 5-3, 3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/08/1992
	122 TYRER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/04/1978
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 35

Citations 35

	V.D. v. CROATIA 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/11/2011
	M.B. v. POLAND 5-3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/07/2011
	1 DURDEVIC v. CROATIA 3, 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/07/2011
	FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE 3, 8, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/2011
	R.R. v. POLAND 3, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/2011
	EL SHENNAWY v. FRANCE 3, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/01/2011
	MANGOURAS v. SPAIN 5-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/2010
	CZECHOWSKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	22/06/2010
	3 CIUPERCESCU v. ROMANIA 3, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/06/2010
	1 STASZEWSKA v. POLAND 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	03/11/2009

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List