ERDOGDU v. TURKEY View

Notes

Date	15/06/2000
AppNr	25723/94
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 10-2; 35-1; 41
Violated / NonViolated	10
Citations	366-16-271018

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - financial award
Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion)
Violation of Art. 10

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-1) freedom to impart ideas
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) prevention of crime
(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-VI
Language	French
Application Number	25723/94
Importance Level	1
Respondent State	Turkey
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	03/06/1999
Date of Judgment	15/06/2000
Conclusion	Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion) ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	10 ; 10-2 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Law no. 3713 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, Section 8 Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 322 § 5
Strasbourg Case Law	Ahmet Sadik v. Greece judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1654, §§ 31-33 ; Baskaya and Okçuoglu v. Turkey [GC], nos 23536/94 and 24408/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 40, § 43, § 49, § 65 ; Çiraklar v. Turkey judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 3070-3071, §§ 29-32 ; Civet v. France [GC], no. 29340/95, ECHR 1999-VI, § 41 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I, § 37, § 45 ; Hashman and Harrup v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 25594/94, ECHR 1999-VIII, § 31 ; Hertel v. Switzerland judgment of 25 August 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2331-2332, § 50 ; Kutcherenko v. Ukraine, decision de 5 May 1999, no. 41974/98 ; News Verlags GmbH & CoKG v. Austria, no. 31457/96, § 52 ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, ECHR 1999-VIII, § 43, § 62 ; Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, ECHR 1999-VI, § 40, §§ 54-55, § 64, § 66, §§ 68-69, § 73 ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, ECHR 1999-IV, § 11, § 59, § 62 ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 3) [GC], no. 24735/94, § 38, § 40 ; Sürek and Özdemir v. Turkey [GC], nos 23927/94 and 24277/94, § 63 ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, ECHR 1999-IX, § 57
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO IMPART IDEAS" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 1

ERDOGDU v. TURKEY

Commission (Plenary) Decision

23/01/1998

References 13

	71 NEWS VERLAGS GmbH & Co. KG v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/01/2000
	177 V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 5-4, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/1999
	207 NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1999
	13 HASHMAN AND HARRUP v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1999
	202 ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/1999
	118 CIVET v. FRANCE Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)	28/09/1999
	38 BASKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY 7, 10, 6-1, 7 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	32 SÜREK AND ÖZDEMIR v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	223 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	27 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 3) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	22 KUCHERENKO contre l'UKRAINE Court (Fourth Section) Decision	04/05/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	171 HERTEL v. SWITZERLAND 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/08/1998

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 47

Citations 47

	SAYGILI AND BILGIÇ v. TURKEY 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/05/2010
	7 FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN 10, 6-1, 6-2 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/04/2010
	7 DEMIREL AND ATES (NO. 3) v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/12/2008
	2 ISAK TEPE v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/10/2008
	1 YALCINER v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/2008
	2 ASAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/2007
	2 BIRDAL v. TURKEY Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/10/2007
	CETIN AND SAKAR v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/09/2007
	3 GUZEL v. TURKEY (No. 3) Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/07/2007
	2 ARTUN AND GÜVENER v. TURKEY Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/06/2007

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List