KNYAZEV v. RUSSIA View

Notes

Date	08/11/2007
AppNr	25948/05
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	29-3; 3; 34; 8
Violated / NonViolated	34
Citations	238P1-1

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of a violation sufficient
Preliminary objections dismissed (locus standi, strike-out request, abuse of the right of application, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Remainder inadmissible
Violation of Art. 34

Keywords:

(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
(art. 34) locus standi
(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	25948/05
Importance Level	2
Represented by	LIPTSER E.
Respondent State	Russia
Date of Judgment	08/11/2007
Conclusion	Preliminary objections dismissed (locus standi, strike-out request, abuse of the right of application, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 34 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of a violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed
Articles	3 , 8 , 29-3 , 34
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Article 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Article 91 § 2 of the Penal Code ; Rule 12 of the Internal Regulations of Correctional Facilities no. 224 of the Ministry of Justice
Strasbourg Case Law	Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV, §§ 53-54, 65-67, 69 and 105 ; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, pp. 2275-2276, §§ 51-52, and p. 2288, § 105 ; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34 ; Cotlet v. Romania, no. 38565/97, § 71, 3 June 2003 ; I.S. v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 32438/96, 6 April 2000 ; Kurt v. Turkey, judgment of 25 May 1998, Reports 1998-III, p. 1192-1193, § 159 and § 160 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, § 78, 4 July 2000 ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V ; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84 ; Slyusarev v. Russia (dec.), no. 60333/00, 9 November 2006 ; Trubnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 49790/99, 14 October 2003 ; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 100-101, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Varbanov v. Bulgaria, no. 31365/96, § 36, ECHR 2000-X ; Whiteside v. the United Kingdom, decision of 7 March 1994, application no. 20357/92, DR 76, p. 80 ; Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2432, § 77
Keywords	"(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) HINDER THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 34) LOCUS STANDI" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE"

References 16

	13 SLYUSAREV v. RUSSIA Court (Third Section) Decision	09/11/2006
	31 TRUBNIKOV v. RUSSIA Court (Second Section) Decision	14/10/2003
	25 COTLET v. ROMANIA 8, 34 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/06/2003
	20 KHASHIYEV and AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision	19/12/2002
	112 VARBANOV v. BULGARIA 5-1, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/10/2000
	69 NIEDBALA v. POLAND 5-3, 5-4, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/07/2000
	136 ROTARU v. ROMANIA 8, 13, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/05/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	18 I.S. v. BULGARIA Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Final)	06/04/2000
	161 VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA Court (Third Section) Decision	14/03/2000
	166 KURT v. TURKEY 5, 3, 13, 25-1, 14, 2, 3, 5, 18 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/05/1998
	722 AKSOY v. TURKEY 3, 5-3, 13, 25-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	28 WHITESIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	07/03/1994
	86 CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1992
	228 SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1983

Citations Breakdown

4 Russia

1–4 of 4

Citations 4

	KHAMZAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 2, 8, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	03/05/2011
	1 SLYUSAREV v. RUSSIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/04/2010
	BRAGIN v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision	28/01/2010
	2 ANDREYEVSKIY v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/01/2009

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List