TANLI v. TURKEY View

Notes

Date	10/04/2001
AppNr	26129/95
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 14; 18; 2; 3; 41; 5
Violated / NonViolated	213351418
Citations	2355-15-35-45-56-181313-21438-138-1-aP1-12355-15-35-46-389131438P1-1

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 14
No violation of Art. 18
No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 5
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - financial award
Violation of Art. 13
Violation of Art. 2
Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the death
Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the investigation

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 14) discrimination
(art. 2-1) life
(art. 3) torture
(art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-III
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	26129/95
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Turkey
Date of Judgment	10/04/2001
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the death ; Violation of Art. 2 with regard to the investigation ; No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 5 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 14 ; No violation of Art. 18 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles	2 ; 3 ; 5 ; 13 ; 14 ; 18 ; 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain judgment of 13 June 1994 (Article 50), Series A no. 285-C, pp. 57-58, §§ 16-20 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52 ; Cakiçi v. Turkey, [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999-V, §§ 98-99, § 112, § 127 ; Ergi v. Turkey judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1778, § 82 ; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, ECHR 2000-VII, §§ 89-93 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 161 ; Kaya v. Turkey judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 329, § 105, pp. 330-331, § 107 ; Klaas v. Germany judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29, p. 18, § 30 ; Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos. 31417/96 and 32377/96 [Section 3] [25.7.00], ECHR 2000, §§ 22-23 ; McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147, §§ 148-149, § 161 ; McKerr v. the United Kingdom [decision], no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000 ; Ribitsch v. Austria judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32 ; Salman v. Turkey, no. 21986/93 [GC], § 16, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V [28.7.99], § 87 ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom judgment (Article 50) of 6 November 1989, Series A no. 38, p. 9, § 15 ; Yasa v. Turkey judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2438, § 100, p. 2442, § 113 ; Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom judgment (Article 50) of 18 October 1982, Series A no. 55, p. 7, § 11
External Sources	Public statement adopted on 15 December 1992, by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture ; Second public adopted on 6 December 1996, by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 2-1) LIFE" "(Art. 3) TORTURE" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION"

Application Documents 1

TANLI v. TURKEY

Commission (Plenary) Decision

05/03/1996

Google

References 17

	343 ILHAN v. TURKEY 3, 13, 2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	519 SALMAN v. TURKEY 2, 3, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	237 McKERR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Third Section) Decision	04/04/2000
	24 LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1999
	115 SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13, 3, 14 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1999
	934 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	275 ÇAKICI v. TURKEY 2, 3, 5, 13, 3, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	135 ERGI v. TURKEY 2, 13, 25-1, 2, 14, 18 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1998
	375 KAYA v. TURKEY 2, 13, 2, 14, 6, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/02/1998
	293 RIBITSCH v. AUSTRIA 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/12/1995
	77 BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN (ARTICLE 50) Court (Plenary) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	13/06/1994
	329 KLAAS v. GERMANY 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/09/1993
	6 RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE COMMISSION Decision	05/05/1993
	206 BARBERÀ, MESSEGUÉ AND JABARDO v. SPAIN 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	06/12/1988
	684 BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/1988
	73 YOUNG, JAMES AND WEBSTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	13/08/1981
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 49

Citations 49

	ESMUKHAMBETOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 2, 13, 8, P1-1, 3, 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/03/2011
	1 GIULIANI AND GAGGIO v. ITALY 2, 13, 38 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/03/2011
	DUDAROVY v. RUSSIA 2, 5, 13-2 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	1 KRIVOVA v. UKRAINE 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/11/2010
	UZER v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/09/2010
	KOSEVA v. BULGARIA Court (Fifth Section) Decision	22/06/2010
	1 FADIME AND TURAN KARABULUT v. TURKEY 2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/05/2010
	1 ÇELIK v. TURKEY (NO. 2) 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/05/2010
	BOJOLYAN v. ARMENIA Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	03/11/2009
	1 KALLIS AND ANDROULLA PANAYI v. TURKEY Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/10/2009

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List