BADER v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

Date	15/05/1996
AppNr	26633/95
Body	Commission (First Chamber)
Type	Decision
Articles	10; 34; 9; P1-3
Violated / NonViolated

Conclusions:

Inadmissible

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom to receive information
(art. 34) actio popularis

References 6

	32 GASKIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989
	150 LEANDER v. SWEDEN 8, 10, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/03/1987
	6 LEIGH, GUARDIAN NEWSPAPERS Ltd., THE OBSERVER v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	11/05/1984
	13 X. Association v. SWEDEN Commission (Plenary) Decision	01/03/1982
	20 X. v. AUSTRIA Commission (Plenary) Decision	10/12/1976
	3 X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	03/10/1975

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–3 of 3

Citations 3

	1 Z. v. LATVIA Court (Third Section) Decision (Partial)	26/01/2006
	15 HILBE v. LIECHTENSTEIN Court (Fourth Section) Decision	07/09/1999
	NURMINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND Commission (First Chambe… Decision	26/02/1997

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List