SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) View

Notes

Date	08/07/1999
AppNr	26682/95
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 41; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6-110
Citations	35-35-45-566-16-3-b6-3-c7910111314P1-3235-166-171011141834

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
No violation of Art. 10
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
Violation of Art. 6-1

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) national security
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) prevention of crime
(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
(art. 10-2) territorial integrity
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
(art. 6-1) independent tribunal
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and just satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-IV
Language	English ; French
Application Number	26682/95
Importance Level	1
Respondent State	Turkey
Referred by	Commission
Date of Reference	17/03/1998
Date of Judgment	08/07/1999
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 10 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	6-1 ; 10 ; 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713 of 12 April 1991), section 8 ; Constitution, Articles 143, 145 ; Law no. 2845 on the creation and rules of procedure of the National Security Courts, sections 5, 6 and 34 ; Military Legal Service Act (Law no. 357), additional sections 7 and 8 ; Article 112 of the Military Criminal Code (of 22 May 1930)
Strasbourg Case Law	Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, §§ 41-42 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-V, p. 1957, § 58 ; Zana v. Turkey judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2539, § 10, pp. 2547-2548, § 51 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54, p. 1568, § 58, p. 1571, §§ 65, 68, p. 1572, § 70, p. 1573, § 72 in fine ; Çiraklar v. Turkey judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 3072-3073, § 38 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21 January 1999, § 45 ; Janowski v. Poland judgment of 21 January 1999, § 19 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria judgment of 25 March 1999, § 79
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

Application Documents 1

4

SÜREK v. TURKEY

Commission (Plenary) Decision

14/10/1996

References 11

	102 ZANA contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	15/02/2000
	172 CEYLAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	7 ARSLAN v. TURKEY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	100 AQUILINA v. MALTA 5-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/04/1999
	565 NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	374 FRESSOZ AND ROIRE v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	87 JANOWSKI v. POLAND 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/01/1999
	359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/06/1998
	76 ZANA v. TURKEY 6-1, 6-3-c, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1997
	61 WINGROVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/11/1996
	265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1986

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 222

Citations 222

	MOR v. FRANCE 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/12/2011
	GOUVEIA GOMES FERNANDES AND FREITAS E COSTA v. PORTUGAL 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/03/2011
	1 OTEGI MONDRAGON v. SPAIN 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/03/2011
	CAMYAR AND BERKTAS v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/02/2011
	FARUK TEMEL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/02/2011
	1 HOFFER AND ANNEN v. GERMANY 6-1, 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/01/2011
	NOVAYA GAZETA V VORONEZHE v. RUSSIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	ALEKSEY OVCHINNIKOV v. RUSSIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/2010
	1 PUBLICO - COMUNICACAO SOCIAL, S.A. AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/12/2010
	GAZETA UKRAINA-TSENTR v. UKRAINE 6-1, 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2010

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List