DOGRU v. FRANCE View

Notes

Date	04/12/2008
AppNr	27058/05
Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	29-3; 9; 9-2
Violated / NonViolated	9
Citations	P1-1

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 9

Keywords:

(art. 9-1) freedom of religion
(art. 9-2) accessibility
(art. 9-2) foreseeability
(art. 9-2) interference
(art. 9-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 9-2) prescribed by law
(art. 9-2) protection of public order
(art. 9-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fifth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Selected for publication in Reports of Judgments and Decisions
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH
Application Number	27058/05
Importance Level	1
Represented by	BONO M.
Respondent State	France
Date of Judgment	04/12/2008
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 9
Articles	9 , 9-2 , 29-3
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Law no. 2004-228 of 15 March 2004 ; Section 10 of the Education (General Principles) Act (Law no. 89-486 of 10 July 1989 - new Article L. 511-1 and 2 of the Education Code ; Article 3-5 of the Decree of 30 August 1985
Strasbourg Case Law	Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, 25 February 1982, § 33, Series A no. 48 ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, 18 June 1971, § 93, Series A no. 12 ; El Morsli v. France (dec.), no. 15585/06, 4 March 2008, ECHR 2008 ; Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, § 65, ECHR 2004-I ; Karaduman v. Turkey, 16278/90, decision of the Commission of 3 May 1993, DR 74, p. 93 ; Köse and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 26625/02, ECHR 2006 ; Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, § 29, Series A no. 176-A ; Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, 10 November 2005, §§ 78 and others, ECHR 2005-XI ; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I ; Phull v. France (dec.), no. 35753/03, ECHR 2005-I, 11 January 2005 ; Refah Partisi (Prosperity Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, § 92, ECHR 2003-II ; Sulak v. Turkey, no. 24515/94, decision of the Commission of 17 January 1996, DR 84-B, p. 98 ; Valsamis v. Greece, 18 December 1996, § 32, Reports of Judgments and decisions 1996-VI ; X v. the United Kingdom, no. 7992/77, decision of the Commission of 12 July 1978, Decisions and reports (DR) 14, p. 234 ; Yanasik v. Turkey, no. 14524/89, decision of the Commission of 6 January 1993, DR 74, p. 14
External Sources	Opinion of the Conseil d’Etat no. 346.893 of 27 November 1989 ; Ministerial circulars of 1989 and 1994
Keywords	"(Art. 9-1) FREEDOM OF RELIGION" "(Art. 9-2) ACCESSIBILITY" "(Art. 9-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 9-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 9-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 9-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF PUBLIC ORDER" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

References 18

	3 EL MORSLI c. FRANCE Court (Third Section) Decision	04/03/2008
	15 KOSE AND 93 OTHERS v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Decision	24/01/2006
	57 LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY 9, P1-2, 8, 10, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	10/11/2005
	68 MAESTRI v. ITALY 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/02/2004
	70 REFAH PARTISI (THE WELFARE PARTY) AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 11 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	13/02/2003
	45 GORZELIK AND OTHERS v. POLAND 11 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	20/12/2001
	18 DAHLAB v. SWITZERLAND Court (Second Section) Decision	15/02/2001
	20 VALSAMIS v. GREECE P1-2, 13, 9, 3, 9, P1-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	6 SULAK v. TURKEY Commission (First Chambe… Decision	17/01/1996
	52 C.R. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/11/1995
	2 VALSAMIS contre la GRÈCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	29/11/1994
	22 KARADUMAN v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	03/05/1993
	55 YANASIK v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision	06/01/1993
	119 KRUSLIN v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/1990
	87 CAMPBELL AND COSANS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM P1-2, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/02/1982
	6 X. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	12/07/1978
	183 CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM 5-4, 5-1, 4, 3, 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	18/06/1971
	131 DE WILDE, OOMS et VERSYP contre la BELGIQUE COMMISSION Decision	07/04/1967

Citations Breakdown

1 No violation of P1-1

1 France

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1 2010

1–1 of 1

Citations 1

CHAGNON AND FOURNIER v. FRANCE

P1-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

15/07/2010

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List