ATHANASSOGLOU AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND View

Notes

Date	06/04/2000
AppNr	27644/95
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	13; 37-1-a; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6-113
Citations	236-1813P1-16-1813P1-1

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 13
No violation of Art. 6-1
Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Partly struck out of the list

Keywords:

(art. 13) arguable claim
(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 37-1-a) absence of intention to pursue petition
(art. 6-1) access to court
(art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations
(art. 6-1) determination (civil)
(art. 6-1) dispute

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-IV
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH
Application Number	27644/95
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Switzerland
Referred by	Commission
Date of Judgment	06/04/2000
Applicability	Art. 6 applicable
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 6-1 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Partly struck out of the list ; Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Articles	6-1 , 13 , 37-1-a
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Sections 6 and 48 of the Federal Administrative Proceedings Act ; Sections 5(1) and 6 of the Federal Act of 23 December 1959 on the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Energy ; Section 100 (u) of the Federal Judicature Act of 16 December 1943
Strasbourg Case Law	Balmer-Schafroth and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 26 August 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1352, § 9, p. 1357, § 32, pp. 1357-1358, § 33, pp. 1358-1359, §§ 37-38 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52 ; Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 65, § 38 ; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 45-46, § 56 ; Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, § 36 ; Kremzow v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-B, p. 41, § 42 ; Le Calvez v. France judgment of 29 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1899-1900, § 56 ; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, § 44, pp. 21-22, § 47 ; Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, p. 17, § 44
Keywords	"(Art. 13) ARGUABLE CLAIM" "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 37-1-a) ABSENCE OF INTENTION TO PURSUE PETITION" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 6-1) DETERMINATION (CIVIL)" "(Art. 6-1) DISPUTE"

References 8

	19 LE CALVEZ v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/07/1998
	64 BALMER-SCHAFROTH AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/08/1997
	121 MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	28/09/1995
	152 FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	21/09/1994
	63 KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA 6-3-c, 6-1, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/09/1993
	684 BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/1988
	233 LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN AND DE MEYERE v. BELGIUM 6-1, 11 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	23/06/1981
	411 GOLDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1975

Citations Breakdown

1–10 of 55

Citations 55

	1 ELLES AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/2010
	IVAN ATANASOV v. BULGARIA 8, P1-1, 6-1, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/12/2010
	ZAPLETAL c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE Court (Fifth Section) Decision	30/11/2010
	24 TSOUKALAS v. GREECE 6-1, 13 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/07/2010
	TEIMURAZ ANDRONIKASHVILI v. GEORGIA Court (Second Section) Decision	22/06/2010
	1 NEJDET SAHIN ET PERIHAN SAHIN v. TURKEY 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/05/2010
	SZAL v. POLAND 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/05/2010
	BELKA v. POLAND 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/05/2010
	EL MORABIT v. THE NETHERLANDS Court (Third Section) Decision	18/05/2010
	1 BALASA v. ROMANIA 6-1, P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	20/04/2010

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List