WLOCH v. POLAND View

Notes

Date	19/10/2000
AppNr	27785/95
Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	35-1; 41; 5-1-c; 5-4; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	5-45-16-1
Citations	25-15-1-c5-35-45-56-1813235-46-114P1-1

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 5-1
No violation of Art. 6-1
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Preliminary objection rejected (abuse of process)
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Violation of Art. 5-4

Keywords:

(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
(art. 5-1-c) criminal offence
(art. 5-1-c) reasonable suspicion
(art. 5-4) procedural guarantees of review
(art. 5-4) speediness of review
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) reasonable time

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Fourth Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-XI
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH;POLISH
Application Number	27785/95
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Poland
Date of Judgment	19/10/2000
Conclusion	Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Preliminary objection rejected (abuse of process) ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles	5-1-c , 5-4 , 6-1 , 41 , 35-1
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Transitional Provisions of the Criminal Code, Article IX ; Code of Criminal Procedure of 1969, Articles 87, 88, 210, 212, 222, 487 § 4, 489 ; Code of Criminal Procedure of 1997, Article 552 § 4
Strasbourg Case Law	judgment of 25 March 1999 [G.C.], no. 31195/96, § 59, § 76, ECHR 1999-II ; Pauwels v. Belgium judgment v. Belguim judgment of 26 May 1988, Series A no. 135, p. 20, § 46 ; Ringeisen v. Austria judgment of 16 July 1971, Series A no. 13, p. 45, § 110 ; Toth v. Austria judgment of 12 December 1991, Series A no. 224, p. 24, § 91 ; Van der Leer v. the Netherlands judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 170, p. 14, § 35 ; Van Droogenbroeck v. Belgium judgment of 25 April 1983 (Article 50), Series A no. 63, p. 7, § 13 ; Wemhoff v. Germany judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, pp. 26-27, § 19 ; Zdebski, Zdebska and Zdebska v. Poland (dec.), no. 27748/95, 6 April 2000 ; Zimmerman and Steiner v. Switzerland judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 35, § 36
Keywords	"(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1-c) CRIMINAL OFFENCE" "(Art. 5-1-c) REASONABLE SUSPICION" "(Art. 5-4) PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-4) SPEEDINESS OF REVIEW" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME"

Application Documents 1

WLOCH v. POLAND

Court (Fourth Section) Decision

30/03/2000

Google

References 34

	189 JECIUS v. LITHUANIA 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-1, 5-3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	31/07/2000
	69 NIEDBALA v. POLAND 5-3, 5-4, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/07/2000
	11 ZDEBSKI, ZDEBSKA AND ZDEBSKA v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	06/04/2000
	60 MUSIAL v. POLAND 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	565 NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	20 HOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-3, 5-5, 6-1, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/02/1999
	101 BELZIUK v. POLAND 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1998
	74 LUKANOV v. BULGARIA 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/03/1997
	722 AKSOY v. TURKEY 3, 5-3, 13, 25-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	67 KAMPANIS v. GREECE 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/1995
	153 MURRAY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-1, 5-2, 5-5, 8, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	28/10/1994
	36 CESARINI v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	12/10/1992
	64 MEGYERI v. GERMANY 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/05/1992
	98 TOTH v. AUSTRIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/12/1991
	40 HUBER v. SWITZERLAND 5-3 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/10/1990
	164 FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-1, 5-5, 5-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	30/08/1990
	61 VAN DER LEER v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-1, 5-2, 5-4 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1990
	8 BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50) Court (Plenary) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	30/05/1989
	44 LAMY v. BELGIUM 5-4, 5-2, 5-3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/03/1989
	39 CIULLA v. ITALY 5-1, 5-5 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/1989
	298 BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-3, 5-5, 5-1, 5-4 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	29/11/1988
	14 PAUWELS v. BELGIUM 5-3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/1988
	49 BOZANO v. FRANCE (ARTICLE 50) Court (Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	02/12/1987
	59 BOZANO v. FRANCE 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	18/12/1986
	15 LAMY v. BELGIUM Commission (Plenary) Decision	10/12/1985
	37 CIULLA v. ITALY Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/12/1985
	169 DE JONG, BALJET AND VAN DEN BRINK v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-3, 5-4, 5-1, 5, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/05/1984
	202 ZIMMERMANN AND STEINER v. SWITZERLAND 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/1983
	13 VAN DROOGENBROECK v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50) Court (Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	25/04/1983
	299 DEWEER v. BELGIUM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/02/1980
	195 RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA (MERITS) 5-3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	16/07/1971
	219 NEUMEISTER v. AUSTRIA 5-3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/06/1968
	214 WEMHOFF v. GERMANY 5-3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/06/1968

Show all (34)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 16

Citations 16

	DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. BELGIUM 2, 5-1, 2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/12/2011
	ALTINOK v. TURKEY 5-4, 5-5, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/11/2011
	5 FELINSKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/2009
	6 ABDULKADIR AKTAS v. TURKEY 5-1-c, 5-4, 5-5, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	31/01/2008
	25 HAMER v. BELGIUM 6-1, 14, 6-1, P1-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/2007
	DENEE C. BELGIQUE Court (First Section) Decision (Final)	01/06/2006
	25 BAGINSKI v. POLAND 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2005
	BOGULAK v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Final)	19/10/2004
	UDOVIK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	24/08/2004
	4 WESOLOWSKI v. POLAND 5-3, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/06/2004

ECHR CaseLaw

WLOCH v. POLAND View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

Google

References 34

Citations Breakdown

Citations 16

Similar documents