CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM
View
Notes
| Date | 18/11/1970 |
| AppNr | 2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66 |
| Body | Court (Plenary) |
| Type | Judgment (Questions of Procedure) |
| Articles | |
| Violated / NonViolated | |
| Citations | 355-1-f5-4635P1-1 |
- Questions of procedure accepted
Application Documents 2
 |
42
CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50)
Court (Plenary)
Judgment (Just Satisfaction)
|
10/03/1972 |  |
|
183
CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM
5-4, 5-1, 4, 3, 8, 13
Court (Plenary)
Judgment (Merits)
|
18/06/1971 | |
References 0
Citations Breakdown
- 2 (art. 5-1-a) after conviction
- 2 (art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
- 1 (art. 5-1) procedure prescribed by law
- 1 (art. 6) civil proceedings
- 1 (art. 6-3-d) examination of witnesses
- 1 (art. 6-3-c) free legal assistance
- 1 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
- 1 (art. 5-4) take proceedings
- 1 []
- 1 (art. 5-4) speediness of review
- 1 (art. 5-4) review of lawfulness of detention
- 1 (art. 5-4) review by a court
- 1 (art. 5-1-f) expulsion
- 1 (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
- 1 (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
- 1 (art. 35-3) ratione temporis
- 1 (art. 35-1) continuing situation
- 1 (art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
- 1 (art. 3) torture
- 1 (art. 3) inhuman treatment
- 4 Inadmissible
- 2 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
- 1 Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) (Art. 14+6)
- 1 Pecuniary damage - financial award
- 1 Violation of Art. 5 by the Russian Federation with regard to all four applicants
- 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8
- 1 No violation of P1-1
- 1 Failure by Moldova to discharge obligations under Art. 34
- 1 Failure by the Russian Federation to discharge obligations under Art. 34
- 1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
- 1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
- 1 Violation of Art. 5 by Moldova with regard to the other applicants
- 1 Violation of Art. 5-1-f
- 1 Violation of Art. 5-4
- 1 Non-pecuniary damage - award
- 1 Admissible
- 1 Violation of Art. 5
- 1 No violation of Art. 5 by Moldova with regard to the first applicant
- 1 No violation of Art. 5
- 1 No violation of Art. 3 by Moldova with regard to the first applicant
Citations 9
|
10
OTTO v. GERMANY
Court (Fifth Section)
Decision
|
10/11/2009 | |
|
4
SADAYKOV v. BULGARIA 
5-1-f, 5-4
Court (Fifth Section)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
22/05/2008 | |
|
2
IOSSELIANI c. GEORGIE
Court (Second Section)
Decision
|
06/09/2005 | |
|
115
ILASCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
3, 5, 3, 5, P1-1
Court (Grand Chamber)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
08/07/2004 | |
|
SCHÄLCHLI v. SWITZERLAND
Court (Second Section)
Decision
|
25/11/2003 | |
|
2
ADELMANNÉ KERTÉSZ v. HUNGARY
Commission (First Chambe…
Decision
|
02/07/1997 | |
|
134
REMLI v. FRANCE
6
Court (Chamber)
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
|
23/04/1996 | |
|
T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
COMMISSION
Decision
|
01/04/1992 | |
|
GILLARD AND GILLARD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary)
Decision
|
13/07/1987 | |
Similar documents
The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.
Generate Similary List
Generate Similary List