CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM View

Notes

Date	18/06/1971
AppNr	2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66
Body	Court (Plenary)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	13; 3; 32; 35-1; 4-2; 4-3-a; 5-1; 5-1-e; 5-3; 5-4; 6; 7; 8
Violated / NonViolated	5-4345-1813
Citations	2355-15-1-e5-1-f5-25-35-45-566-16-26-3-b6-3-c781011131425-134P1-1P7-1P7-223455-15-1-c5-25-35-45-566-16-26-3-b6-3-c6-3-d789101113141834P1-1P1-2

Conclusions:

Just satisfaction reserved
No violation of Art. 13
No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 4
No violation of Art. 5-1
No violation of Art. 8
Preliminary objection partially allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Violation of Art. 5-4

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 4-2) forced labour
(art. 5-1) liberty of person
(art. 5-1-e) vagrants
(art. 5-4) order release
(art. 5-4) take proceedings
(art. 7-1) retroactivity
(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Plenary)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	A12
Language	ENGLISH;ESTONIAN;FRENCH;RUSSIAN
Application Number	2832/66 ; 2835/66 ; 2899/66
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Belgium
Referred by	Belgium
Date of Reference	24/10/1969
Date of Judgment	18/06/1971
Applicability	Art. 5-3 inapplicable ; Art. 7 inapplicable
Conclusion	Preliminary objection partially allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; No violation of Art. 4 ; No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Just satisfaction reserved
Articles	35-1 , 32 , 5-1 , 5-1-e , 5-3 , 5-4 , 6 , 7 , 4-2 , 4-3-a , 8 , 3 , 13
Separate Opinions	Yes
Law at Issue	Belgian Act of 1891
Strasbourg Case Law	Belgian linguistic case judgment of 9 February 1967, Series A no. 5, p. 18 ; Lawless judgment of 14 November 1960, Series A no. 1, p. 11 ; Stögmüller judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 9, pp. 41, 42, paras. 8, 11 ; Matznetter judgment of 10 November 1969, Series A no. 10, p. 32, para. 6 ; De Becker judgment of 27 March 1962, Series A no. 4, p. 26 ; Neumeister judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 44, para. 24 ; Lawless judgment of 1 July 1961, Series A no. 3, p. 54, para. 19
External Sources	Regent's Decree of 23 August 1948, Article 4 ; Belgian Act of 1891, Sections 6, 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18 ; Belgian Criminal Code, Articles 342-344, 47 ; Royal Decree of 20 December 1963, Article 118 et seq ; Act of 1 May 1849, Section 3 ; Royal Decree of 21 May 1965, Article 24 ; Vleminckx case, 21 December 1951
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 4-2) FORCED LABOUR" "(Art. 5-1) LIBERTY OF PERSON" "(Art. 5-1-e) VAGRANTS" "(Art. 5-4) ORDER RELEASE" "(Art. 5-4) TAKE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 7-1) RETROACTIVITY" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"

Application Documents 2

	42 CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM (ARTICLE 50) Court (Plenary) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	10/03/1972
	9 CASES OF DE WILDE, OOMS AND VERSYP ("VAGRANCY") v. BELGIUM Court (Plenary) Judgment (Questions of Procedure)	18/11/1970

Google

References 0

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 182

Citations 182

	POGHOSYAN v. ARMENIA 5-1, 5-3, 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2011
	ZUBOR v. SLOVAKIA 5-1, 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/12/2011
	KOVACIK v. SLOVAKIA 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/11/2011
	KORMOS v. SLOVAKIA 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/11/2011
	3 STUMMER v. AUSTRIA P1-1, 14, 4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/2011
	1 SEBALJ v. CROATIA 5-1, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	KRNJAK v. CROATIA 5-4, 5-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	BERNOBIC v. CROATIA 5-4, 5-1, 5-3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	2 NECHIPORUK AND YONKALO v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/04/2011
	NOWAK v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, P7-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	31/03/2011

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List