UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. AUSTRIA View

Notes

Date	26/02/2002
AppNr	28525/95
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	10; 10-2; 41
Violated / NonViolated	10
Citations	6-16-3-c106-1

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
Pecuniary damage - financial award
Violation of Art. 10

Keywords:

(art. 10-1) freedom of expression
(art. 10-2) interference
(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2002-I
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	28525/95
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	Austria
Date of Judgment	26/02/2002
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 10 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	10 ; 10-2 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Civil Code, section 1330
Strasbourg Case Law	Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, § 83, ECHR 1999-III ; Darby v. Sweden judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 187, p. 14, § 38 ; De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium judgment of 24 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, pp. 233-234, § 37 ; Jersild v. Denmark judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 23, § 31 ; Jerusalem v. Austria, no. 26958/95, § 33, § 43, 27 February 2001 ; Lehideux and Isorni v. France judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2886, § 52 ; Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 June 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 42, p. 28, § 46 ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A no. 204, p. 25, § 57, p. 26, § 59, p. 27, § 63 ; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, p. 38, § 80 (d) ; Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no. 313, p. 19, § 38, p. 18, § 37 ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-IV ; Thorgeir Thorgeirson v. Iceland judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 28, § 63
Keywords	"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS"

Application Documents 1

UNABHANGIGE INITIATIVE INFORMATIONSVIELFALT v. AUSTRIA

Court (Third Section) Decision

12/09/2000

References 14

	113 JERUSALEM v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/02/2001
	8 ANDREAS WABL v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	21/03/2000
	207 NILSEN AND JOHNSEN v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/11/1999
	223 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1999
	183 BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. NORWAY 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/05/1999
	35 LEHIDEUX AND ISORNI v. FRANCE 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	162 DE HAES AND GIJSELS v. BELGIUM 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/02/1997
	95 PRAGER AND OBERSCHLICK v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/04/1995
	172 JERSILD v. DENMARK 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1994
	87 THORGEIR THORGEIRSON v. ICELAND 10, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1992
	97 OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10, 13, 10, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/11/1991
	42 DARBY v. SWEDEN 14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/10/1990
	265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1986
	35 X., Y., Z., V., W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	15/12/1967

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 20

Citations 20

	3 KASABOVA v. BULGARIA 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2011
	NOVAYA GAZETA V VORONEZHE v. RUSSIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/12/2010
	2 SAVGIN v. TURKEY 10, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/02/2010
	1 MAKARENKO v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/12/2009
	KRONE VERLAG GMBH & CO KG v. AUSTRIA Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/11/2008
	2 GODLEVSKIY v. RUSSIA 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/10/2008
	5 DYUNDIN v. RUSSIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/10/2008
	2 FILATENKO v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/12/2007
	9 A/S DIENA ET OZOLINS v. LATVIA 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/07/2007
	15 KARMAN v. RUSSIA 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/12/2006

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List