SCHLUMPF v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR

Notes

Date	08/01/2009
AppNr	29002/06
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	41; 6; 6-1; 8; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated	6-18
Citations	88

Conclusions:

Non-pecuniary damage - award
Violation of Art. 6-1
Violation of Art. 6-1 (fair hearing)
Violation of Art. 6-1 (public hearing)
Violation of Art. 8

Keywords:

(art. 6) civil proceedings
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-1) public hearing
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) interference
margin of appreciation

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	29002/06
Importance Level	2
Represented by	RUBIN B.
Respondent State	Switzerland
Date of Judgment	08/01/2009
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 6-1 (fair hearing) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 (public hearing) ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles	6 , 6-1 , 8 , 8-1 , 8-2 , 41
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no.. 32, pp. 14 et seq., § 26 ; Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no.. 37, p. 16, § 33 ; B. v. France, 25 March 1992, Series A no.. 232-C, p. 47, § 44, pp. 53 et seq., § 63 ; Botta v. Italy, 24 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 422, § 33 ; Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no.. 34884/97, § 30, ECHR 1999-V ; Buchberger v. Austria, no.. 32899/96, § 49, 20 December 2001 ; Bulut v. Austria, 22 February 1996, Reports 1996-II, pp. 355-356, § 29 ; Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, Series A no.. 280-B, p. 28, § 24, p. 37, § 47 ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.. 28957/95, § 76 and § 90, ECHR 2002-VI ; Cossey v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no.. 184, p. 15, § 37 ; Diennet v. France, judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no.. 325-A, pp. 14-15, § 33 ; Döry v. Sweden, no.. 28394/95, §§ 37, 39 and 41, 12 November 2002 ; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, 22 October 1981, Series A no.. 45, pp. 18-19, § 41 ; Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no.. 25735/94, § 66, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Emonet and Others v. Switzerland, no.. 39051/03, § 77, ECHR 2007 ; Fischer v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1995, Series A no.. 312, pp. 20-21, § 44 ; Fredin v. Sweden (no.. 2), judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no.. 283-A, pp. 10-11, §§ 21-22 ; Friedl v. Austria, judgment of 31 January 1995, Series A no.. 305-B, opinion of the Commission, p. 20, § 45 ; Gautrin and Others v. France, judgment of 20 May 1998, Reports 1998-III, pp. 1023-1024, § 42 ; Grant v. the United Kingdom, no 32570/03, ECHR 2006 ; Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no.. 171-A, p. 20, § 66 ; Helmers v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no.. 212-A, p. 16, § 36 ; Hurter v. Switzerland, no.. 53146/99, § 26, 15 December 2005 ; I. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.. 25680/94, § 70, 11 July 2002 ; Keegan v. Ireland, 26 May 1994, Series A no.. 290, p. 19, § 49 ; L. v. Lithuania, no.. 27527/03, §§ 56-60, ECHR 2007 ; Laskey, Jaggard and Brown v. the United Kingdom, 19 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 131, § 36 ; Linnekogel v. Switzerland, no.. 43874/98, § 49, 1 March 2005 ; Luginbühl v. Switzerland (dec.), no.. 42756/02, 17 January 2006 ; Lundevall v. Sweden, no.. 38629/97, § 34 and § 36, 12 November 2002 ; Mamatkoulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I ; Mantovanelli v. France, 18 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, pp. 436-437, § 34 ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no 31, p. 19, § 41 ; McMichael v. the United Kingdom, 24 February 1995, Series A no.. 307-B, p. 57, § 91 ; Mikulic v. Croatia, no.. 53176/99, § 53 and § 57, ECHR 2002-I ; P., C. and S. v. the United Kingdom, no.. 56547/00, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI ; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no.. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III ; Ravnsborg v. Sweden, 23 March 1994, Series A no.. 283-B, pp. 29-30, § 33 ; Rees v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no.. 106 ; Salomonsson v. Sweden, no.. 38978/97, § 34, 12 November 2002 ; Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 June 1993, Series A no.. 263, pp. 19-20, § 58 ; Sheffield and Horsham v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, p. 2026, § 52 ; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos.. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 71, ECHR 1999-VI ; Tejedor García v. Spain, 16 December 1997, Reports 1997-VIII, p. 2796, § 31 ; Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 April 1978, Series A no.. 26, p. 15, § 31 ; Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no.. 288, p. 19, § 59 ; Van Kück v. Germany, no.. 35968/97, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2003-VII ; Vo v. France [GC], no.. 53924/00, § 82, ECHR 2004-VIII ; X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no.. 91, p. 11, § 22 and § 23 ; X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 April 1997, Reports 1997-II ; Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no.. 66, p. 14, § 36
Keywords	"(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) PUBLIC HEARING" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY

References 41

	12 EMONET AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/12/2007
	3 L. v. LITHUANIA 8, 3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/09/2007
	5 GRANT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/05/2006
	3 LUGINBUHL c. SUISSE Court (Fourth Section) Decision	17/01/2006
	15 LINNEKOGEL v. SWITZERLAND 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/03/2005
	80 VO v. FRANCE 2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	08/07/2004
	5 VAN KUCK v. GERMANY 6-1, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/06/2003
	26 LUNDEVALL v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/11/2002
	25 SALOMONSSON v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/11/2002
	45 DÖRY v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	12/11/2002
	36 P., C. AND S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/07/2002
	6 I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2002
	148 CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2002
	126 PRETTY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2, 3, 8, 9, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)	29/04/2002
	5 HURTER v. SWITZERLAND Court (Third Section) Decision (Partial)	21/02/2002
	9 BUCHBERGER v. AUSTRIA 8, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2001
	58 MIKULIC v. CROATIA Court (Fourth Section) Decision	07/12/2000
	154 ELSHOLZ v. GERMANY 8, 6-1, 14, 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/2000
	115 SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 13, 3, 14 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/1999
	19 MAMATKULOV ET ABDURASULOVIC contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	31/08/1999
	587 BOTTAZZI v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	18 SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	30/07/1998
	49 BOTTA v. ITALY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/02/1998
	34 X. , Y. AND Z. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/04/1997
	15 LASKEY, JAGGARD AND BROWN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/02/1997
	55 GAUTRIN, FILLION, MYNARD ET ALLEMANDOU ET AUTRES contre la FRANCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	27/11/1995
	89 FISCHER v. AUSTRIA 6-1, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/04/1995
	15 FRIEDL v. AUSTRIA Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	31/01/1995
	172 KEEGAN v. IRELAND 8, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/05/1994
	302 VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/1994
	43 RAVNSBORG v. SWEDEN 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	23/03/1994
	57 BURGHARTZ v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/1994
	53 B. v. FRANCE 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1992
	134 HELMERS v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/10/1991
	37 COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	27/09/1990
	42 REES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	17/10/1986
	202 ZIMMERMANN AND STEINER v. SWITZERLAND 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/1983
	126 DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	22/10/1981
	277 ARTICO v. ITALY 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/05/1980
	327 MARCKX v. BELGIUM 8, 14, P1-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/06/1979
	66 X. contre les PAYS-BAS COMMISSION Decision	18/09/1961

Show all (41)

	AKTAS ELEKTRIK TIC. A.S. c. TURQUIE Court (Second Section) Decision	30/08/2011
	3 OBST v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/2010
	2 SCHÜTH v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)	23/09/2010

ECHR CaseLaw

SCHLUMPF v. SWITZERLAND View

Notes

ECHR Notes

References 41

Citations Breakdown

Citations 3

Similar documents