I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	19/09/2000
AppNr	29522/95; 30056/96; 30574/96
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	41; 6-1; 6-2
Violated / NonViolated	6-16-1
Citations	36-111135-1-f6-16-3-c

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses - reserved
No separate issue under Art. 6-2
No violation of Art. 6-1
No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards alleged improper collusion
No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards alleged non-disclosure by the prosecution
No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards the length of the proceedings
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Violation of Art. 6-1
Violation of Art. 6-1 as regards the use made at the applicants' trial of transcripts of their interviews

Keywords:

(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) adversarial trial
(art. 6-1) equality of arms
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-1) reasonable time

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-IX
Language	ENGLISH ; FRENCH
Application Number	29522/95 ; 30056/96 ; 30574/96
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	the United Kingdom
Date of Judgment	19/09/2000
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 6-1 as regards the use made at the applicants' trial of transcripts of their interviews ; No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards alleged improper collusion ; No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards alleged non-disclosure by the prosecution ; No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards the length of the proceedings ; No separate issue under Art. 6-2 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses - reserved
Articles	6-1 ; 6-2 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, Ss. 76, 78 Companies Act 1985, Ss 434, 436
Strasbourg Case Law	Adolf v. Austria judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, pp. 17-18, §§ 38-41 ; Brandstetter v. Austria judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, §§ 66 and 67 ; De Cubber v. Belgium judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, p. 19, § 33 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, p. 34 § 33, pp. 34-35, § 34, p. 35 § 39 ; Fayed v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, p. 47, § 61, p. 48, § 62 ; Hozee v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1998, Reports 1998-III, p. 1100, § 43 ; Philis v. Greece (no. 2) judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1083, § 35 ; Portington v. Greece judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2630, § 21 ; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 February 2000 ([GC], no.28901/95, § 60, § 66, to be published in the Court's official reports ; Saunders v. the United Kingdom judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2064, § 67, pp. 2065-66, §§ 70-76., p. 2068, § 80
Keywords	"(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME"

Application Documents 2

	20 I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Third Section) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	25/09/2001
	I.J.L., G.M.R. and A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)	06/07/1999

Google

References 9

	28 CONDRON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/05/2000
	51 ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/02/2000
	126 PORTINGTON v. GREECE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	34 HOZEE v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/05/1998
	70 SAUNDERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/12/1996
	255 EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	16/12/1992
	79 BRANDSTETTER v. AUSTRIA 6-1, 6-1, 6-3-d, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/08/1991
	117 DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/10/1984
	63 ADOLF v. AUSTRIA 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	26/03/1982

Show all (9)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 17

Citations 17

	GEORGI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA Court (Fifth Section) Decision	11/01/2011
	3 STEINIGER c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE Court (Fifth Section) Decision	24/08/2010
	1 EBANKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/01/2010
	S.C. PILOT SERVICE S.A. CONSTANTA v. ROMANIA Court (Third Section) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	22/09/2009
	TEODORESCU v. ROMANIA Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	29/07/2008
	2 IOSIF AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2007
	6 O'HALLORAN AND FRANCIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	29/06/2007
	44 GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. FRANCE 13, 3, 5-1-f Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/04/2007
	MC ILVANNY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	06/03/2007
	1 KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	06/03/2007

ECHR CaseLaw

I.J.L., G.M.R. AND A.K.P. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

Google

References 9

Citations Breakdown

Citations 17

Similar documents