RIAD ET AUTRES ET IDIAB ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE / ECHR

Notes

Date	21/09/2006
AppNr	29787/03; 29810/03
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Decision
Articles	13; 3; 5; 6; 8
Violated / NonViolated
Citations	35-15-1-f5-413P1-1

Conclusions:

Remainder admissible
Remainder inadmissble

Application Documents 1

RIAD AND IDIAB v. BELGIUM

5, 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

24/01/2008

References 24

	2 POURTAL c. FRANCE Court (Second Section) Decision (Final)	13/03/2007
	5 FODALE v. ITALY 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/06/2006
	3 SAMIR SAID AL KHADUMI c. ROUMANIE Court (Second Section) Decision	18/10/2005
	13 MOGOS v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	13/10/2005
	26 GUNAYDIN v. TURKEY 3, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/10/2005
	26 SINGH v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 5-1-f, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/01/2005
	16 MOREIRA BARBOSA v. PORTUGAL Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)	21/12/2004
	30 REINPRECHT v. AUSTRIA Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Final)	12/10/2004
	3 M.G. c. ALLEMAGNE Court (Third Section) Decision	16/09/2004
	65 SLIMANI v. FRANCE 2, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/07/2004
	43 MATENCIO v. FRANCE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/01/2004
	13 SHAMSA v. POLAND 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/11/2003
	61 GANCI v. ITALY 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/10/2003
	20 CONKA ET AUTRES, LA LIGUE DES DROITS DE L'HOMME contre la BELGIQUE Court (Third Section) Decision	13/03/2001
	80 MAAOUIA v. FRANCE 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	05/10/2000
	17 L'ASSOCIATION DES AMIS DE SAINT-RAPHAËL ET DE FREJUS et AUTRES REQUERANTS contre la FRANCE Court (Third Section) Decision	29/02/2000
	19 MAMATKULOV ET ABDURASULOVIC contre la TURQUIE Court (First Section) Decision	31/08/1999
	565 NIKOLOVA v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/03/1999
	74 STEEL AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5-1, 10, 5-1, 5-5, 6-3-a, 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	86 AERTS v. BELGIUM 5-1, 6-1, 5-4, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	30/07/1998
	19 WÓJCIK v. POLAND Commission (Plenary) Decision	07/07/1997
	370 CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5-4, 13, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	251 WINTERWERP v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-4, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/10/1979

Show all (24)

Originating Body	Cour (Première Section)
Document Type	Décision
Language	FRANÇAIS
Application Number	29787/03 ; 29810/03
Importance Level	3
Represented by	SAROLEA, S., avocat, Nivelles ; WARLOP, C., avocat, Bruxelles
Respondent State	Belgique
Date of Introduction	06/08/2003
Date of Decision	21/09/2006
Conclusion	Partiellement irrecevable ; partiellement recevable
Articles	3 ; 8 ; 5 ; 6 ; 13
Strasbourg Case Law	Winterwerp c. Pays-Bas, arrêt du 24 octobre 1979, série A no 33 ; Akdivar et autres c. Turquie, arrêt du 16 septembre 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-IV, p. 1210, § 65 ; Chahal c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 15 novembre 1996, Recueil 1996-V ; Aerts c. Belgique, arrêt du 30 juillet 1998, Recueil 1998-V; Steel et autres c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 23 septembre 1998, Recueil 1998-VII ; Nikolova c. Bulgarie [GC], no 31195/96, § 69, CEDH 1999-II ; Maaouia c. France [GC], no 39652/98, CEDH 2000-X ; Conka c. Belgique, no 51564/99, CEDH 2002-I ; Ganci c. Italie, no 41576/98, CEDH 2003-XI ; Shamsa c. Pologne, nos 45355/99 et 45357/99, 27 novembre 2003 ; Matencio c. France, no 58749/00, 15 janvier 2004 ; Slimani c. France, no 57671/00, CEDH 2004-IX (extraits) ; Singh c. République tchèque, no 60538/00, 25 janvier 2005 ; Mogos c. Roumanie, n° 20420/02, 13 octobre 2005 ; Reinprecht c. Autriche, n° 67175/01, § 48, 53-55, CEDH 2005 ; Mamatkulov et Askarov c. Turquie [GC], nos 46827/99 et 46951/99, § 82, CEDH 2005 ; Fodale c. Italie, n° 70148/01, § 27, 1 juin 2006 ; Günaydin c. Turquie (déc.), n° 27526/95, 25 avril 2002 ; Moreira Barbosa c. Portugal (déc.), nº 65681/01, 29 avril 2004 ; M.G. c. Allemagne (déc.), nº 11103/03, 16 septembre 2004 ; Samir Said Al Khadumi c. Roumanie (déc.), nº 35380/03, 18 octobre 2005 ; Pourtal c. France (déc.), nº 12025/05, 6 juillet 2006 Comm. Eur. D.H. Nº 26757/95, déc. 7.7.97, D.R. 90, p.24

	YOH-EKALE MWANJE v. BELGIUM 3, 13, 5-1-f Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/12/2011
	KANAGARATNAM AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 3, 5-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/12/2011
	1 ZIYA ÇEVIK v. TURKEY P1-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	EFRAIMIDI v. GREECE 3, 5-1, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	R.U. v. GREECE 3, 13, 5-1-f, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/06/2011

ECHR CaseLaw

RIAD ET AUTRES ET IDIAB ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

References 24

Citations Breakdown

Citations 5

Similar documents