D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View

Notes

Date	02/05/1997
AppNr	30240/96
Body	Court (Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 2; 3; 41; 8
Violated / NonViolated	313
Citations	235-25-466-1813235-16891314

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
No violation of Art. 13
Not necessary to examine Art. 2
Not necessary to examine Art. 8
Violation of Art. 3

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 2-1) life
(art. 3) inhuman punishment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports 1997-III
Language	ENGLISH;FRENCH;RUSSIAN
Application Number	30240/96
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	the United Kingdom
Referred by	Commission ; United Kingdom
Date of Reference	28/10/1996
	14/11/1996
Date of Judgment	02/05/1997
Applicability	Art. 3 applicable ; Art. 13 applicable
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 3 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 2 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles	2 ; 3 ; 8 ; 13 ; 41
Rules of Court	A
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	Soering v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, pp. 47-48, paras. 120-124 ; Vilvarajah and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 215, p. 39, paras. 122-123 ; Chahal v. the United Kingdom judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1853, paras. 73-74, p. 1871, para. 151 ; Ahmed v. Austria judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2206, para. 38, p. 2207, paras. 43-44
External Sources	Immigration Act 1971, Part 1, sections 3 (1) and 4 (1) ; Immigration and Nationality Department of the Home Office, policy document (BDI 3/95), August 1995, paras. 2, 4 and 5 ; Court of Appeal, R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte D., judgment of 15 February 1996 ; United Nations Commission on Human Rights, resolution of 9 March 1993 on the protection of human rights in the context of human immunodeficiency virus or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome ; Summit of Heads of Government or Representatives of forty-two States, declaration of 1 December 1994 ; WHO report on "Health conditions in the Americas", 1994, Volume II, concerning St Kitts and Nevis ; Terrence Higgins Trust, "Treatment issues - a basic guide to medical treatment options for people with HIV and AIDS", April 1996
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 2-1) LIFE" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN PUNISHMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT"

Application Documents 1

D.G. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

Commission (Plenary) Decision

26/06/1996

References 4

	42 AHMED v. AUSTRIA 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/12/1996
	370 CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5-4, 13, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/1996
	271 VILVARAJAH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	30/10/1991
	308 SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/1989

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 55

Citations 55

	AHORUGEZE v. SWEDEN 3, 6 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/10/2011
	SUFI AND ELMI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/06/2011
	ANAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	07/06/2011
	2 AL-ZAWATIA v. SWEDEN Court (Third Section) Decision	22/06/2010
	2 OYAL v. TURKEY 2, 6-1, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/03/2010
	2 IYISAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	09/02/2010
	KHOA RAHIM v. NORWAY Court (First Section) Decision	02/07/2009
	51 NA. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	17/07/2008
	M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Final)	24/06/2008
	17 N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	27/05/2008

ECHR CaseLaw