FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM  View

Notes

Date20/06/2000
AppNr33274/96
BodyCourt (Third Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles34; 41; 6; 8
Violated / NonViolated8
Citations5-15-35-46-186-1810
Conclusions:
  • Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
  • Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 34
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 6
  • Violation of Art. 8
Keywords:
  • (art. 8-1) respect for correspondence
  • (art. 8-2) interference
  • (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
  • (art. 8-2) prescribed by law
  • (art. 8-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others



Application Documents 1

FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Court (Third Section) Decision
12/10/1999

References 2

109
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY 
8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
16/12/1992
86
CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/03/1992

Citations Breakdown

Citations 6

GILLBERG v. SWEDEN 
8, 10 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
02/11/2010
46
PISK-PISKOWSKI v. POLAND 
8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
14/06/2005
4
AALMOES AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
Court (Third Section) Decision
25/11/2004
10
G.K. v. POLAND 
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
20/01/2004
4
MIANOWSKI v. POLAND
6-1, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
16/12/2003
23
MATWIEJCZUK v. POLAND 
5-3, 6-1, 8, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
02/12/2003


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List