BAUMANN v. FRANCE View

Notes

Date	22/05/2001
AppNr	33592/96
Body	Court (Third Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 35-1; 6-1; P1-1; P4-2
Violated / NonViolated	6-1P4-2
Citations	35-35-466-16-3-c8910111314P1-1P4-2P4-2-235-35-46-1813P4-2

Conclusions:

Not necessary to examine P1-1
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion)
Violation of Art. 6-1
Violation of P4-2

Keywords:

(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 6) civil proceedings
(art. 6-1) access to court
(p4-2-1) freedom of movement
(p4-2-3) interference
(p4-2-3) necessary in a democratic society
(p4-2-3) prescribed by law

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Third Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2001-V
Language	FRENCH ; ENGLISH
Application Number	33592/96
Importance Level	1
Represented by	N/A
Respondent State	France
Date of Judgment	22/05/2001
Conclusion	Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Not necessary to examine P1-1 ; Violation of P4-2
Articles	6-1 ; 13 ; 35-1 ; P1-1 ; P4-2
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	A. v. France judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-B, p. 48, § 32 ; AGOSI v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 October 1986, Series A no. 108 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 69 ; Cardot v. France judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34 ; Dalia v. France judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 87-88, § 38 ; De Moor v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1994, Series A no. 292-A, pp. 16-17, § 50 ; Geouffre de la Pradelle v. France judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 253-B, p. 43, §§ 36-37 ; Guzzardi v. Italy judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, pp. 29-30, § 80, p. 33, § 92 ; Hentrich v. France judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 18, § 33 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 193, § 197, ECHR 2000-IV ; Peltonen v. Finland, decision of the Commission of 20 February 1995, D.R. 80-A, p. 43, § 1 ; Piermont v. France judgment of 27 April 1995, Series A no. 314, p. 20 § 44 ; Raimondo v. Italy judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-1, p. 19, § 39 ; Remli v. France judgment of 23 April 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 571, § 33 ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V ; Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, p. 18, § 35 ; Vernillo v. France judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, pp. 11-12, § 27 ; M. v. Germany, no. 10307/83, decision of the Commission of 6 March 1984, D.R. 37, p. 113
Keywords	"(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(P4-2-1) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT" "(P4-2-3) INTERFERENCE" "(P4-2-3) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(P4-2-3) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"

Application Documents 1

1

BAUMANN contre la FRANCE

Court (Third Section) Decision

14/03/2000

References 16

	23 S.A.R.L. DU PARC D'ACTIVITES DE BLOTZHEIM and LA S.C.I HASELAECKER v. FRANCE Court (Second Section) Decision	18/03/2003
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	934 SELMOUNI v. FRANCE 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/07/1999
	328 DALIA v. FRANCE 8, 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/02/1998
	880 AKDIVAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8, 25-1, P1-1, 14, 18 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/09/1996
	134 REMLI v. FRANCE 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1996
	33 PIERMONT v. FRANCE 10, P4-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/04/1995
	14 PELTONEN v. FINLAND Commission (Plenary) Decision	20/02/1995
	193 HENTRICH v. FRANCE P1-1, 6-1, 6-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/09/1994
	44 DE MOOR v. BELGIUM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/06/1994
	119 RAIMONDO v. ITALY P1-1, P4-2, P1-1, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/02/1994
	505 CARDOT v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/03/1991
	364 VERNILLO v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	20/02/1991
	74 M. v. the FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY Commission (Plenary) Decision	06/03/1984
	210 GUZZARDI v. ITALY 5-1, 3, 6, 9, 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/11/1980
	14 GUZZARDI v. ITALY Commission (Plenary) Decision	10/03/1977

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 133

Citations 133

	GOGINASHVILI v. GEORGIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	04/10/2011
	DIAMANTE AND PELLICCIONI v. SAN MARINO 8, P4-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/09/2011
	WIZERKANIUK v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/07/2011
	JOVICIC v. CROATIA 6-1 Court (First Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	ŽIVALJEVIC v. MONTENEGRO 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/03/2011
	PREMININY v. RUSSIA 6-1, 13, P4-2 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	1 MINARIK c. RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE P4-2 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	2 ANDREEV c. BULGARIE Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	NALBANTSKI v. BULGARIA 6-1, 13, P4-2 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	POTAPENKO v. HUNGARY 6-1, P4-2-2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	01/02/2011

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List