DE CLERCK v. BELGIUM / ECHR

Notes

Date	25/09/2007
AppNr	34316/02
Body	Court (Second Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	13; 41; 46; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6-113
Citations	35-35-46-16-2

Conclusions:

Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Violation of Art. 13
Violation of Art. 6-1

Keywords:

(art. 13) effective remedy
(art. 46-1) abide by judgment
(art. 46-2) individual measures
(art. 46-2) measures of a general character
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) reasonable time

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Second Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	34316/02
Importance Level	2
Represented by	VANDE MAELE J.-P. ; COOPMAN, B.
Respondent State	Belgium
Date of Judgment	25/09/2007
Conclusion	Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles	6-1 , 13 , 41 , 46
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	APBP v. France, no. 38436/97, § 41, 21 March 2002 ; Assanidze v. Georgie [GC], no. 71503/01, ECHR 2004-II ; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, ECHR 2004-V ; C.P. and Others v. France, no. 36009/97, §§ 30 à 35, 1er August 2000 ; Coëme and Others v. Belgium, no. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32546/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, ECHR 2000-VII, § 133 ; Doustaly v. France du 23 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 859, § 48 ; Eckle v. Germany du 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 33, § 73 ; Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 21 June 1983, Series A no, p. § 13 ; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII ; I.A. v. France, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 2984-2985, § 121 ; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no48787/99, ECHR 2004-VII ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 152, 156, 159, ECHR 2000 XI ; Mifsud v. France (dec.), no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII ; Nasri v. France du 13 July 1995, Series A no. 320-B, p. 26, § 50 ; Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (article 50) du 31 October 1995, Series A no. 330-B, pp. 58-59, § 34 ; Pelladoah v. the Netherlands du 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-B, p. 34, § 44 ; Remli v. France du 23 April 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 575, § 54 ; Ruotolo v. Italy du 27 February 1992, Series A no. 230-D, p. 39, § 17 ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], no. 39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Sejdovic v. Italy, no. 56581/00, 10 November 2004 ; Strain and Others v. Romania, no. 57001/00, ECHR 2005-VII ; Stratégies and Communications and Demoulin v. Belgium, no. 37370/97, 15 July 2002 ; Wloche v. Poland, no. 27785/95, § 144, ECHR 2000-XI
Keywords	"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 46-1) ABIDE BY JUDGMENT" "(Art. 46-2) INDIVIDUAL MEASURES" "(Art. 46-2) MEASURES OF A GENERAL CHARACTER" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME"

Application Documents 2

	DE CLERCK c. BELGIQUE Court (First Section) Decision (Final)	06/04/2006
	1 DE CLERCK ET AUTRE c. BELGIQUE Court (First Section) Decision (Partial)	24/02/2005

References 20

	174 SEJDOVIC v. ITALY 6 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/11/2004
	115 ILASCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 3, 5, 3, 5, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/2004
	44 VACHEV v. BULGARIA 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/2004
	242 BRONIOWSKI v. POLAND P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/06/2004
	6 ASSANIDZE contre la GEORGIE Court (Second Section) Decision	12/11/2002
	366 MIFSUD v. FRANCE Court (Grand Chamber) Decision	11/09/2002
	27 STRATEGIES AND COMMUNICATIONS AND DUMOULIN v. BELGIUM 6-1, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2002
	23 APBP v. FRANCE 6-1, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/03/2002
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	28 C.P. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	01/08/2000
	213 SCOZZARI AND GIUNTA v. ITALY 8, 8, 3, P1-2 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/2000
	2790 FRYDLENDER v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	67 WLOCH v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	30/03/2000
	149 I.A. v. FRANCE 5-3, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/1998
	69 DOUSTALY v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1998
	134 REMLI v. FRANCE 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/04/1996
	81 PAPAMICHALOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE (ARTICLE 50) Court (Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)	31/10/1995
	28 NASRI v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/07/1995
	27 PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/09/1994
	448 ECKLE v. GERMANY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	15/07/1982

Show all (20)

	TYTECA ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	24/08/2010
	STEFANOU v. GREECE 3, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/04/2010
	KHATCHADOURIAN c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	12/01/2010
	3 PHSEROWSKY c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	07/04/2009
	4 BEHEYT v. BELGIUM Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/05/2008
	1 GARSOUX AND MASSENET v. BELGIUM Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/05/2008
	WAUTERS ET SCHOLLAERT v. BELGIUM Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/05/2008
	HEREMANS v. BELGIUM Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/04/2008
	3 WAUTERS ET SCHOLLAERT c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	13/11/2007
	BEHEYT c. BELGIQUE Court (Second Section) Decision	09/10/2007

ECHR CaseLaw

DE CLERCK v. BELGIUM View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

References 20

Citations Breakdown

Citations 12

Similar documents