PAULESCU v. ROMANIA  View

Notes

Date10/06/2003
AppNr34644/97
BodyCourt (Second Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits)
Articles29-3; 35-1; 6-1; P1-1
Violated / NonViolatedP1-1
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible under Art. 6-1
  • Just satisfaction reserved
  • Violation of P1-1
Keywords:
  • (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
  • (art. 35-1) six month period
  • (p1-1-1) deprivation of property
  • (p1-1-1) possessions



Application Documents 1

6
PAULESCU v. ROMANIA
Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)
20/04/2004

References 9

7
LOYEN v. FRANCE No. 2
Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)
30/09/2003
5
GOLEA v. ROMANIA
6-1, P1-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
17/12/2002
34
HARALAMBIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 
Court (Second Section) Judgment (Lack of Jurisdiction)
29/03/2001
28
GAILLARD contre la FRANCE 
Court (Third Section) Decision
11/07/2000
131
WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
Court (Third Section) Decision
25/01/2000
685
BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA 
6-1, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/10/1999
202
PAPACHELAS v. GREECE 
P1-1, 6-1, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/03/1999
107
WORM v. AUSTRIA
Commission (Plenary) Decision
27/11/1995
131
DE WILDE, OOMS et VERSYP contre la BELGIQUE 
COMMISSION Decision
07/04/1967

Citations 1

OZKAN v. TURKEY
Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)
04/10/2005


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List