BOGUMIL v. PORTUGAL View

Notes

Date	07/10/2008
AppNr	35228/03
Body	Court (Second Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	29-3; 3; 35-1; 41; 6-1; 6-1+6-3-c; 6-3-c; 8; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated	6-16-3-c38
Citations	35-35-46-16-3-c

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 3
No violation of Art. 8
Non-pecuniary damage - award
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c

Keywords:

(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 3) inhuman treatment
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
(art. 6) criminal proceedings
(art. 6-1) fair hearing
(art. 6-3) rights of defence
(art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
(art. 8-1) respect for private life
(art. 8-2) interference
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law
(art. 8-2) protection of health

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (Second Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Published in	Selected for publication in Reports of Judgments and Decisions
Language	FRENCH
Application Number	35228/03
Importance Level	1
Represented by	WIERZBICKI P.
Respondent State	Portugal
Date of Judgment	07/10/2008
Conclusion	Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c ; No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 8 ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles	3 ; 6-1 ; 6-3-c ; 6-1+6-3-c ; 8 ; 8-2 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions	No
Strasbourg Case Law	Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2276, § 54 ; Cardot v. France, judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200, p. 18, § 34 ; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 48, § 34 ; Czekalla v. Portugal, no. 38830/97, § 60, ECHR 2002-VIII ; Daud v. Portugal, judgment of 21 April 1998, §§ 39, 42, Reports 1998-II ; Gennadiy Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 42023/98, §§ 108, 112, 10 February 2004 ; Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, §§ 82, 88, 89, Series A no. 244 ; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 69, 72-74, ECHR 2006-IX ; Juhnke v. Turkey, no. 52515/99, § 76, 13 May 2008 ; Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, pp. 17-18, § 30 ; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, §§ 37, 40, ECHR 2002-IX ; Nevmerjitski v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 72, ECHR 2005-II (extracts) ; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII ; Van Geyseghem v. Belgium [GC], no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I ; Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 40, pp. 17-18, § 35 ; X. and Y. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, §§ 22-27 ; Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX
Keywords	"(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PROTECTION OF HEALTH"

References 17

	18 JUHNKE v. TURKEY 8, 6-1, 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	13/05/2008
	135 JALLOH v. GERMANY 3, 6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/07/2006
	62 NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1-c, 5-3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	05/04/2005
	50 NAUMENKO v. UKRAINE 3, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)	10/02/2004
	39 Y.F. v. TURKEY 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/07/2003
	181 MOUISEL v. FRANCE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	14/11/2002
	11 CZEKALLA v. PORTUGAL 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/10/2002
	61 PRICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/07/2001
	144 VAN GEYSEGHEM v. BELGIUM 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/01/1999
	45 DAUD v. PORTUGAL 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/04/1998
	722 AKSOY v. TURKEY 3, 5-3, 13, 25-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/12/1996
	329 KLAAS v. GERMANY 3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	22/09/1993
	75 COSTELLO-ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	25/03/1993
	68 HERCZEGFALVY v. AUSTRIA 5-4, 8, 10, 3, 5-1, 5-3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/09/1992
	505 CARDOT v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	19/03/1991
	135 VAN OOSTERWIJCK v. BELGIUM Court (Plenary) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)	06/11/1980
	22 X. and Y. v. the NETHERLANDS Commission (Plenary) Decision	19/12/1974

1–1 of 1

Citations 1

2

GUVEC v. TURKEY

3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)

20/01/2009

Similar documents

	29 RUPA v. ROMANIA (No. 1) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-c, 8, 8-2, 13, 13+3, 34, 35-1, 41	16/12/2008
	3 DOLENEC v. CROATIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 6-3, 8, 8-1, 35, 35-1, 41	26/11/2009
	FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. UKRAINE Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35, 35-1, 41	07/07/2011
	11 LOPATA v. RUSSIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 6-1+6-3-c, 6-3, 6-3-c, 34, 35, 35-1, 41	13/07/2010
	3 VITAN v. ROMANIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-3-c, 8, 29-3, 35-1, 41	25/03/2008
	26 MOISEYEV v. RUSSIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 7, 8, 41	09/10/2008
	4 DAMIAN-BURUEANA AND DAMIAN v. ROMANIA Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35, 35-1, 41	26/05/2009
	8 BÖKE AND KANDEMIR v. TURKEY Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 5, 5-3, 6, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-c, 6-1+6-3-c, 41	10/03/2009
	2 GÖK AND GÜLER v. TURKEY Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 6-3, 6-3-c, 6-1+6-3-c, 41	28/07/2009
	36 ENEA v. ITALY Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 3, 6, 6-1, 8, 8-1, 8-2, 35-1, 41	17/09/2009