LINDNER AND HAMMERMAYER v. ROMANIA  View

Notes

Date03/12/2002
AppNr35671/97
BodyCourt (Second Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles29-3; 41; 6-1; P1-1; P4-2-2
Violated / NonViolated6-1P1-1
Conclusions:
  • Inadmissible under P4-2-2
  • No violation of P1-1
  • Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
  • Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
  • Violation of Art. 6-1
Keywords:
  • (art. 35-3) ratione temporis
  • (art. 6) civil proceedings
  • (art. 6-1) access to court
  • (p1-1-1) deprivation of property
  • (p1-1-1) possessions



Application Documents 1

LINDNER AND HAMMERMAYER v. ROMANIA 
Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Struck out of the List)
06/04/2006

References 8

33
OUZOUNIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 
6-1, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits)
18/04/2002
194
MALHOUS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 
Court (Grand Chamber) Decision
13/12/2000
685
BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA 
6-1, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/10/1999
12
LUPULET v. ROMANIA
Commission (Plenary) Decision
17/05/1996
222
PRESSOS COMPANIA NAVIERA S.A. AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 
P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
20/11/1995
96
HIRO BALANI v. SPAIN 
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/12/1994
210
VAN DER MUSSELE v. BELGIUM 
4, 14, P1-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
23/11/1983
36
DE NAPOLES PACHECO v. BELGIUM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
05/10/1978
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List