TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA View

Notes

Date	19/07/2007
AppNr	36898/03
Body	Court (First Section)
Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles	3; 34; 35-1; 41; 5
Violated / NonViolated	3
Citations	35-15-1-c5-35-46-16-26-3-b6-3-c8133435-46-16-26-3-b6-3-c6-3-d734

Conclusions:

Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Preliminary objection partially allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Remainder inadmissible
Violation of Art. 3
Violation of Art. 3 (conditions of detention)

Keywords:

(art. 3) degrading treatment
(art. 34) victim
(art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies

ECHR Notes

Originating Body	Court (First Section)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Language	ENGLISH
Application Number	36898/03
Importance Level	2
Represented by	LIPTSER Y.L.
Respondent State	Russia
Date of Introduction	14/11/2003
Date of Judgment	19/07/2007
Conclusion	Preliminary objection partially allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 (conditions of detention) ; Remainder inadmissible ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Articles	3 ; 5 ; 34 ; 35-1 ; 41
Rules of Court	55
Separate Opinions	No
Law at Issue	Criminal Code, Article 222 ; Criminal Procedure Code, Articles 91, 94, 97, 98, 108, 447, 448, 450 § 5 ; Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Articles 1070 and 1100
Strasbourg Case Law	Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, p. 846, § 36 ; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, §§ 37-43, ECHR 2004-III ; Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, 22 May 2001 ; Beck v. Norway, no. 26390/95, § 27, 26 June 2001 ; Brusco v. Italy (dec.), no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX ; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 30, ECHR 2002-III ; Charzy?ski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, ECHR 2005-V , Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, § 72, ECHR 2006 ; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II ; Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 32, §§ 69 et seq. ; Fedotov v. Russia (no. 5140/02, § 68, 25 October 2005 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161 ; Jensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 48470/99, ECHR 2001-X ; Kadi?is v. Latvia (no. 2), no. 62393/00, §§ 20 et 52, 4 May 2006 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI ; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 104 et seq., ECHR 2005-X ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 154-55, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, §§ 41-49, 16 June 2005 ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, §§ 39 et seq., 20 January 2005 ; Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, § 17, ECHR 2002-VIII ; N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, §§ 42-45, ECHR 2002-X ; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, §§ 41 et seq., 2 June 2005 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Valasinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, §§ 100-01, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, § 90, ECHR 2000-XI ; Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 46347/99, 2 September 2004
Keywords	"(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES"

Application Documents 1

TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA

Court (First Section) Decision

15/09/2005

Google

References 29

	54 KADIKIS v. LATVIA (No. 2) 3, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	04/05/2006
	186 KHUDOYOROV v. RUSSIA 3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/11/2005
	46 FEDOTOV v. RUSSIA 3, 5-1, 5-5, 6-1, P1-1, 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/10/2005
	79 NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	02/06/2005
	232 CHARZYNSKI v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	01/03/2005
	125 MAYZIT v. RUSSIA 3, 5-4, 6-3-c, 6-3-b Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	20/01/2005
	584 COCCHIARELLA v. ITALY 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/11/2004
	2 XENIDES-ARESTIS v. TURKEY Court (Third Section) Decision	02/09/2004
	68 LABZOV v. RUSSIA Court (First Section) Decision (Final)	08/01/2004
	90 N.C. v. ITALY 5-5 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	18/12/2002
	366 MIFSUD v. FRANCE Court (Grand Chamber) Decision	11/09/2002
	219 KALASHNIKOV v. RUSSIA 3, 5-3, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/07/2002
	47 AZINAS v. CYPRUS P1-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	20/06/2002
	100 JENSEN v. DENMARK Court (Second Section) Decision	20/09/2001
	256 BRUSCO v. ITALY Court (Second Section) Decision	06/09/2001
	56 BECK v. NORWAY 6 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	26/06/2001
	488 BURDOV v. RUSSIA Court (Second Section) Decision	21/06/2001
	133 BAUMANN v. FRANCE 6-1, P4-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	22/05/2001
	235 PEERS v. GREECE 3, 8, 6-2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	19/04/2001
	1907 KUDLA v. POLAND 5-3, 6-1, 13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2000
	519 SALMAN v. TURKEY 2, 3, 13 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	27/06/2000
	1035 LABITA v. ITALY 3, 5-3, 5-1, 8, P4-2, P1-3, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	06/04/2000
	67 WLOCH v. POLAND Court (Fourth Section) Decision	30/03/2000
	161 VALASINAS v. LITHUANIA Court (Third Section) Decision	14/03/2000
	133 DOUGOZ v. GREECE Court (Third Section) Decision	08/02/2000
	458 DALBAN v. ROMANIA 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	28/09/1999
	433 AMUUR v. FRANCE 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	25/06/1996
	448 ECKLE v. GERMANY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	15/07/1982
	924 IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3, 5, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	18/01/1978

Show all (29)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 36

Citations 36

	TSYGONIY v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	24/11/2011
	TAGGATIDIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2011
	ORLOV v. RUSSIA 3, 13, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 34 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/06/2011
	POPANDOPULO v. RUSSIA 3, 13, 3, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/05/2011
	PELEVIN v. RUSSIA 5-3, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/02/2011
	TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA (NO. 2) 3, 5-4, 3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/2010
	PORUMB v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/12/2010
	COMAN v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2010
	3 CUCOLAS v. ROMANIA 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/10/2010
	ALEKSANDR LEONIDOVICH IVANOV v. RUSSIA 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/09/2010

ECHR CaseLaw

TREPASHKIN v. RUSSIA View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 1

Google

References 29

Citations Breakdown

Citations 36

Similar documents