EPNERS-GEFNERS v. LATVIA  View

Notes

Date25/05/2010
AppNr37862/02
BodyCourt (Third Section)
TypeDecision
Articles37-1; 5-3; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated
Conclusions:
  • Partly admissible
  • Partly inadmissible
  • Partly struck out of the list



References 12

6
OZOLINS v. LATVIA
Court (Third Section) Decision
09/09/2008
7
BORISOVS v. LATVIA
Court (Third Section) Decision
02/09/2008
8
KAPITONOVS v. LATVIA
Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)
24/06/2008
36
VARNAVA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 
2, 3, 5 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/01/2008
38
ESTRIKH v. LATVIA 
5-3, 6-1, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
18/01/2007
548
TAHSIN ACAR v. TURKEY 
Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)
06/05/2003
25
YOUNGER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 
Court (Second Section) Decision
07/01/2003
131
LAVENTS v. LATVIA 
5-3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-2, 8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/11/2002
189
JECIUS v. LITHUANIA 
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 5-1, 5-3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
31/07/2000
15
KEENAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (Plenary) Decision
22/05/1998
111
WORM v. AUSTRIA
10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
29/08/1997
33
AGROTEXIM HELLAS S.A., BIOTEX S.A., HYMOFIX HELLAS S.A., KYKLADIKI S.A., MEPEX S.A. AND TEXEMA S.A. v. GREECE
COMMISSION Decision
12/02/1992
 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List