IONESCU v. ROMANIA  View

Notes

Date02/11/2004
AppNr38608/97
BodyCourt (Second Section)
TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Articles29-3; 41; 6-1; P1-1
Violated / NonViolated6-1P1-1
Conclusions:
  • Just satisfaction reserved
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1
  • Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 concerning the independence and impartiality of the court
  • Violation of Art. 6-1
  • Violation of Art. 6-1 due to absence of the right to a fair trial
  • Violation of Art. 6-1 due to refusal of the right of access to court
  • Violation of P1-1
Keywords:
  • (art. 6) civil proceedings
  • (art. 6-1) access to court
  • (p1-1-1) deprivation of property
  • (p1-1-1) possessions



Application Documents 1

IONESCU v. ROMANIA
Court (Third Section) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)
10/11/2005

Google



References 4

4
FALCOIANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
6-1, P1-1, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/07/2002
685
BRUMARESCU v. ROMANIA 
6-1, P1-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/10/1999
63
ACQUAVIVA v. FRANCE 
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
21/11/1995
121
MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS 
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/09/1995

Citations 1

IONESCU v. ROMANIA
Court (Third Section) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)
10/11/2005


 

Similar documents

The list is not generated automatically, click Generate to proceed. Wait until the list appears, it may take several seconds.

Generate Similary List