MAAOUIA v. FRANCE View

Notes

Date	05/10/2000
AppNr	39652/98
Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Type	Judgment (Merits)
Articles	6-1
Violated / NonViolated	6
Citations	35-15-1-f5-25-46-16-278913143446P7-13566-181334P1-1P4-4

Conclusions:

No violation of Art. 6

Keywords:

(art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations
(art. 6-1) criminal charge

Application Documents 2

	MAAOUIA v. FRANCE Court (Grand Chamber) Decision (Final)	22/03/2000
	33 MAAOUIA v. FRANCE Court (Third Section) Decision (Partial)	12/01/1999

References 20

	56 BAGHLI v. FRANCE 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)	30/11/1999
	24 MALIGE v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	23/09/1998
	6 MAILLARD v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	09/06/1998
	68 NEIGEL v. FRANCE Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	17/03/1997
	4 URRUTIKOETXEA v. FRANCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/12/1996
	6 KAREEM v. SWEDEN Commission (Plenary) Decision	25/10/1996
	26 JAMIL v. FRANCE 7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/06/1995
	49 WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/02/1995
	151 TYLER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	05/04/1994
	95 BENDENOUN v. FRANCE 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)	24/02/1994
	60 FRANCESCO LOMBARDO v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	26/11/1992
	27 BARAONA v. PORTUGAL 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	08/07/1987
	45 FELDBRUGGE v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	29/05/1986
	78 BENTHEM v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	23/10/1985
	27 BOZANO v. FRANCE Commission (Plenary) Decision	15/05/1984
	12 SINGH AND UPPAL v. UNITED KINGDOM Commission (Plenary) Decision	02/05/1979
	234 KLASS AND OTHERS v. GERMANY 8, 13, 6 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	06/09/1978
	125 KÖNIG v. GERMANY 6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	28/06/1978
	400 ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 6, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)	08/06/1976
	411 GOLDER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	21/02/1975

Show all (20)

Citations Breakdown

root_id} AND l.from_root_id=r.id GROUP_BY r.y ORDER BY r.y DESC"; // echo var_dump($ary); ?>

1–10 of 80

Citations 80

	AL HANCHI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	15/11/2011
	EMRE v. SWITZERLAND (No. 2) 8, 46 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	11/10/2011
	BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 9 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	07/07/2011
	NOWAK v. UKRAINE 3, 5-1, 5-2, 5-4, P7-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	31/03/2011
	1 N.M. AND M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Court (Fourth Section) Decision	25/01/2011
	1 ELLES AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	16/12/2010
	LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	09/11/2010
	A.M. c. FRANCE Court (Fifth Section) Decision	12/10/2010
	GHORBANOV AND OTHERS v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)	24/08/2010
	5 GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN 3, 13, 5-1-f Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)	10/06/2010

Originating Body	Court (Grand Chamber)
Document Type	Judgment (Merits)
Published in	Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2000-X
Language	English ; French
Application Number	39652/98
Importance Level	1
Respondent State	France
Date of Judgment	05/10/2000
Applicability	Atticle 6 not applicable
Conclusion	No violation of Art. 6
Articles	6-1
Separate Opinions	Yes
Strasbourg Case Law	Baraona v. Portugal judgment of 8 July 1987, Series A no. 122, pp. 17-18, § 42 ; Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 34, § 81 ; König v. the Federal Republic of Germany judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, pp. 29-30, §§ 88-89 ; Maillard v. France judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-III, pp. 1303-1304, §§ 39-41 ; Malige v. France judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2935, § 34 ; Neigel v. France judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, pp. 410-411, §§ 43-44 ; Bozano v. France, decision of the Commission of 15 May 1984, no. 9990/82, DR 39, p. 119 ; Decision of the Commission of 26 February 1997, no. 32809/96 ; Kareem v. Sweden, decision of the Commission of 25 October 1996, no. 32025/96, DR 87, p. 174 ; Singh Uppal and Others v. the United Kingdom, decision of the Commission of 2 May 1979, no. 8244/78, DR 17, p. 149 ; Tyler v. the United Kingdom, decision of the Commission of 5 April 1994, no. 21283/93, DR 77, pp. 81-86 ; Urrutikoetxea v. France, decision of the Commission of 5 December 1996, no. 31113/96, DR 87, p. 151
External Sources	Explanatory report on Protocol No. 7
Keywords	"(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 6-1) CRIMINAL CHARGE"

ECHR CaseLaw

MAAOUIA v. FRANCE View

Notes

ECHR Notes

Application Documents 2

References 20

Citations Breakdown

Citations 80

Similar documents